Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
Simsek, Cem; Kaya, Cansu; Karalezli, Aylin.
Affiliation
  • Simsek C; Mugla Sitki Koçman University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Mugla, Turkey.
  • Kaya C; Mugla Sitki Koçman University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Mugla, Turkey.
  • Karalezli A; Mugla Sitki Koçman University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Mugla, Turkey.
Turk J Ophthalmol ; 52(5): 318-323, 2022 10 28.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36317802
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. Materials and

Methods:

The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the ages of 18-30 who presented to the Ophthalmology Clinic of Mugla Sitki Koçman University Training and Research Hospital. Autorefractor (Topcon, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (Ceniscan, USA), high-resolution Pentacam (Oculus, USA), anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue, USA), and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg, Germany) measurements were assessed.

Results:

The mean age of the study participants was 23.2±0.2 years and the mean CCT was 540±14.1 µm, with no statistically significant difference in CCT between sexes (p>0.05). Mean CCT values were 557.0±26.7 µm with the autorefractor, 543.6±32.9 µm with UP, 533.8±30.2 µm with the Oculus Pentacam, 519.8±30.1 µm with Optovue AS-OCT, and 547.5±31.6 µm with Heidelberg AS-OCT. Pairwise comparisons between devices showed that the Optovue AS-OCT gave significantly lower CCT measurements than the autorefractor and Heidelberg AS-OCT device (p=0.027 and p=0.033, respectively). The coefficient of repeatability for autorefractor, UP, high-resolution Pentacam, Optovue AS-OCT, and Heidelberg AS-OCT CCT measurements were 1.51%, 2.46%, 3.72%, 2.57%, and 3.34%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Measurements made with five different devices showed that CCT was comparable and clinically usable. However, it was determined that the Optovue AS-OCT showed lower CCT values compare to other devices. When compared in terms of repeatability, it was found to be lower in the Pentacam than other devices.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cornea / Tomography, Optical Coherence / Corneal Pachymetry Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Turk J Ophthalmol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cornea / Tomography, Optical Coherence / Corneal Pachymetry Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Turk J Ophthalmol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey