Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prior Myocardial Infarction and Treatment Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes - A Post-hoc Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.
Lahu, Shqipdona; Scalamogna, Maria; Ndrepepa, Gjin; Menichelli, Maurizio; Valina, Christian; Hemetsberger, Rayyan; Witzenbichler, Bernhard; Bernlochner, Isabell; Joner, Michael; Xhepa, Erion; Hapfelmeier, Alexander; Kufner, Sebastian; Sager, Hendrik B; Mayer, Katharina; Kessler, Thorsten; Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig; Richardt, Gert; Schunkert, Heribert; Neumann, Franz-Josef; Kastrati, Adnan; Cassese, Salvatore.
Affiliation
  • Lahu S; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
  • Scalamogna M; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany.
  • Ndrepepa G; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
  • Menichelli M; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy.
  • Valina C; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
  • Hemetsberger R; Ospedale Fabrizio Spaziani, Cardiology Frosinone Italy.
  • Witzenbichler B; Department of Cardiology and Angiology II University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, Standort Bad Krozingen Bad Krozingen Germany.
  • Bernlochner I; Heart Center Bad Segeberg, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Bad Segeberg Bad Segeberg Germany.
  • Joner M; Helios Amper-Klinikum Dachau, Cardiology & Pneumology Dachau Germany.
  • Xhepa E; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany.
  • Hapfelmeier A; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik Innere Medizin I (Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pneumologie), Klinikum rechts der Isar Munich Germany.
  • Kufner S; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
  • Sager HB; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany.
  • Mayer K; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
  • Kessler T; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine Institute of AI and Informatics in Medicine Munich Germany.
  • Laugwitz KL; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research Munich Germany.
  • Richardt G; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
  • Schunkert H; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
  • Neumann FJ; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany.
  • Kastrati A; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
  • Cassese S; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(24): e027257, 2022 12 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36515247
ABSTRACT
Background The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and prior myocardial infarction (MI) remain unstudied. We aimed to assess the treatment effect of ticagrelor versus prasugrel according to prior MI status in patients with ACS. Methods and Results Patients with acute coronary syndrome planned for an invasive strategy and randomized to ticagrelor or prasugrel in the ISAR-REACT (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) 5 trial were included. The primary end point was the composite of 1-year all-cause death, MI, or stroke; the secondary safety end point was the composite of 1-year Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 to 5 bleeding. The study included 4015 patients (prior MI=631 patients; no prior MI=3384 patients). As compared with patients without prior MI, the primary end point occurred more frequently in patients with prior MI (12.6% versus 7.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.78 [95% CI, 1.38-2.29]); the secondary safety end point appears to differ little between patients with and without prior MI (5.8% versus 5.7%, respectively; HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.71-1.45]). With regard to the primary end point, ticagrelor versus prasugrel was associated with an HR of 1.62 (95% CI, 1.03-2.55) in patients with prior MI and an HR of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.99-1.65) in patients without prior MI (Pint=0.37). With regard to the secondary safety end point, ticagrelor versus prasugrel was associated with an HR of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.56-2.91) in patients with prior MI and an HR of 1.13 (95% CI, 0.82-1.55) in patients without prior MI (Pint=0.79). Conclusions Patients with acute coronary syndrome and prior MI are at higher risk for recurrent ischemic but not bleeding events. Prasugrel is superior to ticagrelor in reducing the risk of ischemic events without a tradeoff in bleeding regardless of prior MI status. Registration URL https//www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT01944800.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Acute Coronary Syndrome / Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / Myocardial Infarction Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Acute Coronary Syndrome / Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / Myocardial Infarction Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Year: 2022 Document type: Article