Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Responsiveness of the late life disability instrument to pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD.
O'Hoski, Sachi; Kuspinar, Ayse; Richardson, Julie; Wald, Joshua; Goldstein, Roger; Beauchamp, Marla K.
Affiliation
  • O'Hoski S; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada; Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Centre, 82 Buttonwood Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6M 2J5, Canada. Electronic address: ohoskisa@mcmaster.ca.
  • Kuspinar A; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada. Electronic address: kuspinaa@mcmaster.ca.
  • Richardson J; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada. Electronic address: jrichard@mcmaster.ca.
  • Wald J; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada; Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada. Electronic address: Joshua.wald@medportal.ca.
  • Goldstein R; Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Centre, 82 Buttonwood Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6M 2J5, Canada. Electronic address: roger.goldstein@westpark.org.
  • Beauchamp MK; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada; Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Centre, 82 Buttonwood Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6M 2J5, Canada; Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue
Respir Med ; 207: 107113, 2023 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36608861
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To establish the responsiveness of the disability component of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLDI) and its Computer Adaptive Test (LLDI-CAT) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHOD:

Participants completed the LLDI, LLDI-CAT and measures of physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptom severity before and after pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), and global rating of change (GRC) scales at the end of PR. Responsiveness was explored by calculating correlations between LLDI and LLDI-CAT change scores and change scores on the other measures, and calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the ability of the LLDI and LLDI-CAT to discriminate between participants who were improved versus unchanged. We hypothesized fair correlations (-0.3 to -0.5 or 0.3 to 0.5) with other measures and considered an AUC≥0.7 acceptable. Minimal important differences (MIDs) were estimated using anchor- and distribution-based approaches.

RESULTS:

Fifty participants (mean (SD) age 69.8 (7.9) years) completed the study. Only the limitation dimension of the LLDI showed improvement at follow-up (z = 2.4, p = 0.018) and was able to discriminate between participants who were improved versus unchanged (AUC 0.7 (95% CI 0.6-0.9)). Correlations between change scores were as hypothesized between the participation measures and measures of at least two other constructs.

CONCLUSION:

This study provides MID values for the LLDI and LLDI-CAT to support their clinical application. The limitation dimension of the LLDI appears to be particularly responsive to PR in people with COPD.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disabled Persons / Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Respir Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disabled Persons / Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Respir Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article
...