Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of an anti-α-Gal IgE fluoroenzyme-immunoassay for the screening of patients at risk of severe anaphylaxis to cetuximab.
Serrier, Julien; Davy, Jean-Baptiste; Dupont, Benoît; Clarisse, Bénédicte; Parienti, Jean-Jacques; Petit, Gautier; Khoy, Kathy; Ollivier, Yann; Gervais, Radj; Mariotte, Delphine; Le Mauff, Brigitte.
Affiliation
  • Serrier J; Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
  • Davy JB; University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France.
  • Dupont B; INSERM U1237, Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders, Caen, France.
  • Clarisse B; Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
  • Parienti JJ; Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Nutrition, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
  • Petit G; Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
  • Khoy K; University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France.
  • Ollivier Y; Department of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
  • Gervais R; Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
  • Mariotte D; Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
  • Le Mauff B; University Center for Allergic Diseases (CUMA), CHU Caen, Caen, France.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 32, 2023 Jan 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36624467
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The link between immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) following the first cetuximab infusion and the IgE sensitization against anti-galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) is now well-established. An automated Fluoroenzyme-Immunoassay (FEIA) is available and may facilitate the screening of patients with anti-α-Gal IgE before treatment.

METHODS:

This study aimed to evaluate its performances as compared to a previously validated anti-cetuximab IgE ELISA, using 185 samples from two previously studied cohorts.

RESULTS:

Despite 21.1% of discrepancies between the two techniques, FEIA discriminated better positive patients and similarly negative ones with a ≥ 0.525 kUA/L threshold. Sensitivity was 87.5% for both tests, specificity was better for FEIA (96.3% vs ELISA 82.1%). FEIA had a higher positive likelihood ratio (23.9 vs ELISA 4.89) and a similar negative likelihood ratio (0.13 vs ELISA 0.15). In our population, the risk of severe HSR following a positive test was higher with FEIA (56.7% vs ELISA 19.6%) and similar following a negative test (0.7% vs ELISA 0.8%).

CONCLUSION:

Although the predictive value of the IgE screening before cetuximab infusion remains discussed, this automated commercial test can identify high-risk patients and is suitable for routine use in laboratories. It could help avoiding cetuximab-induced HSR by a systematic anti-α-Gal IgE screening before treatment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Food Hypersensitivity / Anaphylaxis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France Country of publication: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Food Hypersensitivity / Anaphylaxis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France Country of publication: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM