Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Empirical studies on how ethical recommendations are translated into practice: a cross-section study on scope and study objectives.
Schwietering, Johannes; Langhof, Holger; Strech, Daniel.
Affiliation
  • Schwietering J; QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178, Berlin, Germany. schwietering.johannes@mh-hannover.de.
  • Langhof H; QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
  • Strech D; QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Med Ethics ; 24(1): 2, 2023 01 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36631789
BACKGROUND: Empirical research can become relevant for bioethics in at least two ways. First, by informing the development or refinement of ethical recommendations. Second, by evaluating how ethical recommendations are translated into practice. This study aims to investigate the scope and objectives of empirical studies evaluating how ethical recommendations are translated into practice. METHODS: A sample of the latest 400 publications from four bioethics journals was created and screened. All publications were included if they met one of the following three criteria: (1) evaluative empirical research, (2) non-evaluative empirical research and (3) borderline cases. For all publications categorized as evaluative empirical research we analyzed which objects (norms and recommendations) had been evaluated. RESULTS: 234 studies were included of which 54% (n = 126) were categorized as non-evaluative empirical studies, 36% (n = 84) as evaluative empirical studies, and 10% (n = 24) as borderline cases. The object of evaluation were aspirational norms in 5 of the 84 included evaluative empirical studies, more specific norms in 14 (16%) studies and concrete best practices in 65 (77%) studies. The specific best practices can be grouped under five broader categories: ethical procedures, ethical institutions, clinical or research practices, educational programs, and legal regulations. CONCLUSIONS: This mapping study shows that empirical evaluative studies can be found at all stages in the translational process from theory to best practices. Our study suggests two intertwined dimensions for structuring the field of evaluative/translational empirical studies in bioethics: First, three broader categories of evaluation objects and second five categories for types of best practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The methodology used was described in a study protocol that was registered publicly on the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/r6h4y/ ).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bioethics Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Ethics Journal subject: ETICA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bioethics Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Ethics Journal subject: ETICA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: United kingdom