Bioaccessibility and bioavailability of NPAHs in soils using in vitro-in vivo assays: Comparison of laboratory and outdoor environmental aging effect.

ABSTRACT

Aging process is one of the most important factors that markedly reduces bioaccessibility and bioavailability (bioac-bioav) of organic contaminants. However, only few data on comparison of the effects of laboratory artificial aging (LAA) and outdoor environmental aging (OEA) processes on nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (NPAHs) bioac-bioav are available. In the current study, oral bioac-bioav of NPAHs in LAA and OEA soils (aging time intervals 0, 45, 90, 120 and 150 d) were measured by in vitro traditional Fed ORganic Estimation human Simulation Test (FOREhST) and Tenax improved FOREhST (TI-FOREhST) methods, and in vivo mouse model. Tenax significantly increased the bioaccessibility of NPAHs in freshly spiked and aging soils from 0.3-40.9 % to 15.6-95.3 %, and 0.3-40.9 % to 1.0-84.5 %, respectively. Aging significantly reduced the NPAHs bioaccessibility (from 36.5 % to 10.7 %, and 12.1 % to 5.1 % as measured by FOREhST and TI-FOREhST, respectively) and bioavailability (from 27.7 % to 9.9 %, as measured by mouse model). The changes in bioac-bioav were mainly observed within the first 120 d of aging. The statistical analyses of NPAHs bioac-bioav showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) among the aging time intervals in LAA and OEA soils, which demonstrated that the LAA can relatively represent the OEA. Determination of TOC content in LAA and OEA soil can intuitively reflect whether the difference of NPAHs bioac-bioav between two aging treatment groups is significant. The mean bioaccessibility of NPAHs in soil measured by TI-FOREhST (mean 20.6 %) is closer to the bioavailability measured by mouse model (mean 19.4 %), indicating that Tenax improved in vitro method is more reliable than traditional methods, to predict the bioavailability of NPAHs.