Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment.
Ottestad, Anine Larsen; Huang, Mo; Emdal, Elisabeth Fritzke; Mjelle, Robin; Skarpeteig, Veronica; Dai, Hong Yan.
Affiliation
  • Ottestad AL; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
  • Huang M; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
  • Emdal EF; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
  • Mjelle R; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
  • Skarpeteig V; Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Dai HY; Department of Pathology, Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
J Pers Med ; 13(1)2022 Dec 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36675703
ABSTRACT
(1)

Background:

Analysis of tumor DNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) plays various roles in the classification and management of cancer. This study aimed to assess the performance of two similar and large, comprehensive gene panels with a focus on clinically relevant variant detection and tumor mutation burden (TMB) assessment; (2)

Methods:

DNA from 19 diagnostic small cell lung cancer biopsies and an AcroMetrix™ assessment sample with >500 mutations were sequenced using Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCAP) on the Ion Torrent platform and TruSight Oncology 500 Assay (TSO500) on the Illumina platform; (3)

Results:

OCAP and TSO500 achieved comparable NGS quality, such as mean read coverage and mean coverage uniformity. A total of 100% of the variants in the diagnostic samples and 80% of the variants in the AcroMetrix™ assessment sample were detected by both panels, and the panels reported highly similar variant allele frequency. A proportion of 14/19 (74%) samples were classified in the same TMB category; (4)

Conclusions:

Comparable results were obtained using OCAP and TSO500, suggesting that both panels could be applied to screen patients for enrolment in personalized cancer treatment trials.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Pers Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Norway

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Pers Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Norway