Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clostridioides difficile Near-Patient Testing Versus Centralized Testing: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial.
Doolan, Cody P; Sahragard, Babak; Leal, Jenine; Sharma, Anuj; Kim, Joseph; Spackman, Eldon; Hollis, Aidan; Pillai, Dylan R.
Affiliation
  • Doolan CP; Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Sahragard B; Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Leal J; Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Sharma A; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Kim J; Ephicacy Canada Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Spackman E; Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Hollis A; Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Pillai DR; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(11): 1911-1918, 2023 06 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36718646
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Management of suspected Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in the hospital setting typically results in patient isolation, laboratory testing, infection control, and presumptive treatment. We investigated whether implementation of rapid near-patient testing (NPT) reduced patient isolation time, hospital length of stay (LOS), antibiotic usage, and cost.

METHODS:

A 2-period pragmatic cluster randomized crossover trial was conducted. Thirty-nine wards were randomized into 2 study arms. The primary outcome measure was effect of NPT on patient isolation time using a mixed-effects generalized linear regression model. Secondary outcomes examined were hospital LOS and antibiotic therapy based on a negative binomial regression model. Natural experiment (NE), intention-to-treat (ITT), and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted.

RESULTS:

During the entire study period, a total of 656 patients received NPT for CDI and 1667 received standard-of-care testing. For the primary outcome, a significant decrease of patient isolation time with NPT was observed (NE, 9.4 hours [P < .01]; ITT, 2.3 hours [P < .05]; PP, 6.7 hours [P < .1]). A significant reduction in hospital LOS was observed with NPT for short stay (NE, 47.4% [P < .01]; ITT, 18.4% [P < .01]; PP, 34.2% [P < .01]). Each additional hour delay for a negative result increased metronidazole use (24 defined daily doses per 1000 patients; P < .05) and non-CDI-treating antibiotics by 70.13 mg (P < .01). NPT was found to save 25.48 US dollars per patient when including test cost to the laboratory and patient isolation in the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS:

This pragmatic cluster randomized crossover trial demonstrated that implementation of CDI NPT can contribute to significant reductions in isolation time, hospital LOS, antibiotic usage, and healthcare cost. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03857464.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clostridioides difficile / Clostridium Infections Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Infect Dis Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clostridioides difficile / Clostridium Infections Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Infect Dis Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada