Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Frequency of Dental X-ray Diagnostics in Children and Adolescents: What Is the Radiation Exposure?
Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig; Schüler, Ina Manuela; Scherbaum, Rebecca; Buschek, Rika; Scheithauer, Marcel; Jacobs, Collin; Mentzel, Hans-Joachim.
Affiliation
  • Hennig CL; Department of Orthodontics, Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany.
  • Schüler IM; Section Preventive Dentistry and Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany.
  • Scherbaum R; Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Buschek R; Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Scheithauer M; Radiation Protection, Center for Health and Safety Management, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Jacobs C; Department of Orthodontics, Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany.
  • Mentzel HJ; Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(3)2023 Jan 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36766499
Children are exposed to ionizing radiation through radiographs during their development for various reasons. At present, there are no officially valid reference values for dental X-rays in children and adolescents for dental X-ray diagnostics. This study retrospectively examined 9680 extraoral dental radiographs in pediatric patients between 2002 and 2020. The aim was to analyze the radiation doses in pediatric patients, which indications were used, and whether there were specific age and gender differences. The evaluation showed that radiation doses were considered low, with dose area products of 2.2 cGy × cm2 for a lateral cephalogram, 14 cGy × cm2 for an orthopantomogram (OPG), and 45 cGy × cm2 for cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). This corresponds to an effective dose of 1.5 µSv for a lateral cephalogram, 7 µSv for an OPG, and 33.8 µSv for CBCT. Of the 9680 images, 78% were orthopantomograms, and only 0.4% were CBCT images. OPG has become more important over the years, as reflected in the indication. Approximately one-third of all extraoral exposures are orthodontic indications. Overall, the indications were similar for both genders. According to the dental indications, boys were X-rayed slightly more frequently than girls (54.5-45.5%). A future publication of dose guide values and corresponding guidelines is of high priority.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Language: En Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Language: En Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: Switzerland