Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Established and Novel Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmission Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Modified Delphi and Focus Group Study to Identify Clinically Important Predictors.
Gould, Daniel; Dowsey, Michelle; Spelman, Tim; Bailey, James; Bunzli, Samantha; Rele, Siddharth; Choong, Peter.
Affiliation
  • Gould D; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
  • Dowsey M; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
  • Spelman T; Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
  • Bailey J; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
  • Bunzli S; School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
  • Rele S; Nathan Campus, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.
  • Choong P; Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
J Clin Med ; 12(3)2023 Jan 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36769396
Thirty-day readmission following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an important outcome influencing the quality of patient care and health system efficiency. The aims of this study were (1) to ascertain the clinical importance of established risk factors for 30-day readmission risk and give clinicians the opportunity to suggest and discuss novel risk factors and (2) to evaluate consensus on the importance of these risk factors. This study was conducted in two stages: a modified Delphi survey followed by a focus group. Orthopaedic surgeons and anaesthetists involved in the care of TKA patients completed an anonymous survey to judge the clinical importance of risk factors selected from a systematic review and meta-analysis and to suggest other clinically meaningful risk factors, which were then discussed in a focus group designed using elements of nominal group technique. Eleven risk factors received a majority (≥50%) vote of high importance in the Delphi survey overall, and six risk factors received a majority vote of high importance in the focus group overall. Lack of consensus highlighted the fact that this is a highly complex problem which is challenging to predict and which depends heavily on risk factors which may be open to interpretation, difficult to capture, and dependent upon personal clinical experience, which must be tailored to the individual patient.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Switzerland