Image quality using synthetic brain MRI: an age-stratified study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might replace the conventional MR sequences in brain evaluation to shorten scan time and obtain multiple quantitative parameters. PURPOSE: To evaluate the image quality of multiple-delay-multiple-echo (MDME) sequence-derived synthetic brain MR images compared to conventional images by considering a multi-age sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Image sets of conventional and synthetic MRI of 200 participants were included. On the basis of the presence of intracranial lesions, the participants were divided into a normal group and a pathological group. Two neuroradiologists compared the anonymous and unordered images. Image quality, artifacts, and diagnostic performance were analyzed. RESULTS: In the quantitative analysis, comparing with conventional images, MDME sequence-derived synthetic MRI demonstrated an equal/greater signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in all age groups. Specifically, for participants aged ≤2 years, synthetic T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging showed a significantly higher cerebellum gray/white matter CNR (P < 0.05). In the qualitative and artifact analyses, except for the superior sagittal sinus and cranial nerves, synthetic MRI showed good imaging quality (≥3 points) in all brain structures. On synthetic T1-weighted imaging, high signal intensity within the superior sagittal sinus was found in most of our participants (107/118, 90.7%). No difference was observed between synthetic and conventional MRI in diagnosing the lesions. CONCLUSION: MDME sequence-derived synthetic MRI showed similar image quality and diagnostic performance with a shorter acquisition time than conventional MRI. However, the high signal intensity within the superior sagittal sinus on synthetic T1-weighted images requires consideration.