Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific computed tomography lung phantoms: a reader study.
Shapira, Nadav; Donovan, Kevin; Mei, Kai; Geagan, Michael; Roshkovan, Leonid; Gang, Grace J; Abed, Mohammed; Linna, Nathaniel B; Cranston, Coulter P; O'Leary, Cathal N; Dhanaliwala, Ali H; Kontos, Despina; Litt, Harold I; Stayman, J Webster; Shinohara, Russell T; Noël, Peter B.
Affiliation
  • Shapira N; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Donovan K; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Mei K; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Geagan M; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Roshkovan L; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Gang GJ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
  • Abed M; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Linna NB; Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 79G3+3RR Qadisaya Expy, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Cranston CP; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • O'Leary CN; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Dhanaliwala AH; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Kontos D; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Litt HI; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Stayman JW; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Shinohara RT; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
  • Noël PB; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
PNAS Nexus ; 2(3): pgad026, 2023 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36909822
ABSTRACT
In modern clinical decision-support algorithms, heterogeneity in image characteristics due to variations in imaging systems and protocols hinders the development of reproducible quantitative measures including for feature extraction pipelines. With the help of a reader study, we investigate the ability to provide consistent ground-truth targets by using patient-specific 3D-printed lung phantoms. PixelPrint was developed for 3D-printing lifelike computed tomography (CT) lung phantoms by directly translating clinical images into printer instructions that control density on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Data sets of three COVID-19 patients served as input for 3D-printing lung phantoms. Five radiologists rated patient and phantom images for imaging characteristics and diagnostic confidence in a blinded reader study. Effect sizes of evaluating phantom as opposed to patient images were assessed using linear mixed models. Finally, PixelPrint's production reproducibility was evaluated. Images of patients and phantoms had little variation in the estimated mean (0.03-0.29, using a 1-5 scale). When comparing phantom images to patient images, effect size analysis revealed that the difference was within one-third of the inter- and intrareader variabilities. High correspondence between the four phantoms created using the same patient images was demonstrated by PixelPrint's production repeatability tests, with greater similarity scores between high-dose acquisitions of the phantoms than between clinical-dose acquisitions of a single phantom. We demonstrated PixelPrint's ability to produce lifelike CT lung phantoms reliably. These phantoms have the potential to provide ground-truth targets for validating the generalizability of inference-based decision-support algorithms between different health centers and imaging protocols and for optimizing examination protocols with realistic patient-based phantoms. Classification CT lung phantoms, reader study.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: PNAS Nexus Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: PNAS Nexus Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...