Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
DNA barcoding of Chinese snakes reveals hidden diversity and conservation needs.
Wu, Yun-He; Hou, Shao-Bing; Yuan, Zhi-Yong; Jiang, Ke; Huang, Ru-Yi; Wang, Kai; Liu, Qin; Yu, Zhong-Bin; Zhao, Hai-Peng; Zhang, Bao-Lin; Chen, Jin-Min; Wang, Li-Jun; Stuart, Bryan L; Chambers, E Anne; Wang, Yu-Fan; Gao, Wei; Zou, Da-Hu; Yan, Fang; Zhao, Gui-Gang; Fu, Zhong-Xiong; Wang, Shao-Neng; Jiang, Ming; Zhang, Liang; Ren, Jin-Long; Wu, Ya-Yong; Zhang, Lu-Yang; Yang, Dian-Cheng; Jin, Jie-Qiong; Yin, Ting-Ting; Li, Jia-Tang; Zhao, Wen-Ge; Murphy, Robert W; Huang, Song; Guo, Peng; Zhang, Ya-Ping; Che, Jing.
Affiliation
  • Wu YH; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Hou SB; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Yuan ZY; Kunming College of Life Science, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650204, China.
  • Jiang K; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Huang RY; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Wang K; Shanghai Collaborative Innovation for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China.
  • Liu Q; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Yu ZB; Faculty of Agriculture, Forest and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin, Sichuan, 644007, China.
  • Zhao HP; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Zhang BL; School of Life Science, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475001, China.
  • Chen JM; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Wang LJ; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Stuart BL; School of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, Hainan, 571158, China.
  • Chambers EA; Section of Research & Collections, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27601, USA.
  • Wang YF; Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
  • Gao W; Zhejiang Forest Resource Monitoring Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310020, China.
  • Zou DH; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Yan F; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Zhao GG; College of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa, Tibet, 850000, China.
  • Fu ZX; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Wang SN; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Jiang M; Yunnan Senye Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 666100, China.
  • Zhang L; Bureau of Guangxi Mao'er Mountain Nature Reserve, Guilin, Guangxi, 541316, China.
  • Ren JL; Gongshan Bureau of Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve, Gongshan, Yunnan, 650224, China.
  • Wu YY; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510260, China.
  • Zhang LY; Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
  • Yang DC; Faculty of Agriculture, Forest and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin, Sichuan, 644007, China.
  • Jin JQ; Beijing Mountains & Seas Eco Technology Co. Ltd, Beijing, 101100, China.
  • Yin TT; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resource, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
  • Li JT; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Zhao WG; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Murphy RW; Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
  • Huang S; College of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150025, China.
  • Guo P; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China.
  • Zhang YP; Reptilia Zoo and Education Centre, Vaughn, Ontario, L4K 2N6, Canada.
  • Che J; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resource, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China.
Mol Ecol Resour ; 23(5): 1124-1141, 2023 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36924341
ABSTRACT
DNA barcoding has greatly facilitated studies of taxonomy, biodiversity, biological conservation, and ecology. Here, we establish a reliable DNA barcoding library for Chinese snakes, unveiling hidden diversity with implications for taxonomy, and provide a standardized tool for conservation management. Our comprehensive study includes 1638 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences from Chinese snakes that correspond to 17 families, 65 genera, 228 named species (80.6% of named species) and 36 candidate species. A barcode gap analysis reveals gaps, where all nearest neighbour distances exceed maximum intraspecific distances, in 217 named species and all candidate species. Three species-delimitation methods (ABGD, sGMYC, and sPTP) recover 320 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), of which 192 OTUs correspond to named and candidate species. Twenty-eight other named species share OTUs, such as Azemiops feae and A. kharini, Gloydius halys, G. shedaoensis, and G. intermedius, and Bungarus multicinctus and B. candidus, representing inconsistencies most probably caused by imperfect taxonomy, recent and rapid speciation, weak taxonomic signal, introgressive hybridization, and/or inadequate phylogenetic signal. In contrast, 43 species and candidate species assign to two or more OTUs due to having large intraspecific distances. If most OTUs detected in this study reflect valid species, including the 36 candidate species, then 30% more species would exist than are currently recognized. Several OTU divergences associate with known biogeographic barriers, such as the Taiwan Strait. In addition to facilitating future studies, this reliable and relatively comprehensive reference database will play an important role in the future monitoring, conservation, and management of Chinese snakes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biodiversity / DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biodiversity / DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China
...