Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Latent Factors of Language Disturbance and Relationships to Quantitative Speech Features.
Tang, Sunny X; Hänsel, Katrin; Cong, Yan; Nikzad, Amir H; Mehta, Aarush; Cho, Sunghye; Berretta, Sarah; Behbehani, Leily; Pradhan, Sameer; John, Majnu; Liberman, Mark Y.
Affiliation
  • Tang SX; Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
  • Hänsel K; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
  • Cong Y; Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
  • Nikzad AH; Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
  • Mehta A; Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
  • Cho S; Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Berretta S; Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
  • Behbehani L; Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
  • Pradhan S; Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
  • John M; Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
  • Liberman MY; Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Schizophr Bull ; 49(Suppl_2): S93-S103, 2023 03 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36946530
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Quantitative acoustic and textual measures derived from speech ("speech features") may provide valuable biomarkers for psychiatric disorders, particularly schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). We sought to identify cross-diagnostic latent factors for speech disturbance with relevance for SSD and computational modeling. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical ratings for speech disturbance were generated across 14 items for a cross-diagnostic sample (N = 334), including SSD (n = 90). Speech features were quantified using an automated pipeline for brief recorded samples of free speech. Factor models for the clinical ratings were generated using exploratory factor analysis, then tested with confirmatory factor analysis in the cross-diagnostic and SSD groups. The relationships between factor scores and computational speech features were examined for 202 of the participants. STUDY RESULTS: We found a 3-factor model with a good fit in the cross-diagnostic group and an acceptable fit for the SSD subsample. The model identifies an impaired expressivity factor and 2 interrelated disorganized factors for inefficient and incoherent speech. Incoherent speech was specific to psychosis groups, while inefficient speech and impaired expressivity showed intermediate effects in people with nonpsychotic disorders. Each of the 3 factors had significant and distinct relationships with speech features, which differed for the cross-diagnostic vs SSD groups. CONCLUSIONS: We report a cross-diagnostic 3-factor model for speech disturbance which is supported by good statistical measures, intuitive, applicable to SSD, and relatable to linguistic theories. It provides a valuable framework for understanding speech disturbance and appropriate targets for modeling with quantitative speech features.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychotic Disorders / Schizophrenia Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Schizophr Bull Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Psychotic Disorders / Schizophrenia Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Schizophr Bull Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States