Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing a Practice-Based Model with a Research-Based Model of social skills interventions for children with autism in schools.
Locke, Jill; Rotheram-Fuller, Erin; Harker, Colleen; Kasari, Connie; Mandell, David S.
Affiliation
  • Locke J; University of Washington, United States.
  • Rotheram-Fuller E; Arizona State University, United States.
  • Harker C; University of Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Kasari C; University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
  • Mandell DS; University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Res Autism Spectr Disord ; 62: 10-17, 2019 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36970398
Background: Social impairment is the most challenging core deficit for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Several evidence-based interventions address social impairment in children with ASD; however, adoption, use, and implementation of these interventions in schools is challenging. Method: Ninety-two children with ASD who received one of three intervention models: a) School personnel adapted and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Practice-Based Model; n = 14); b) University researcher developed and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Research-Based Model; n = 45); or c) standard educational practices model (Inclusion Only Model; n = 33) participated. The average age was 8.4 (SD = 1.6) years; majority was male (88%) and white (52.2%). Typically developing classmates completed sociometric ratings to determine children's social network inclusion, and independent raters observed children on the playground using a time-interval behavior coding system to record solitary engagement and frequency of initiations. Results: Separate linear regression models were conducted. Children in the Research-Based Model had significantly higher social network inclusion than children in the other two settings (p = .05). Children in the Practice-Based Model had significantly lower solitary engagement (p = .04) and more initiations on the playground than children in the University Developed Model (p = .04). Conclusions: The results suggest that researchers: 1) may learn from public school stakeholders who have lived experiences to better understand the context in which implementation occurs; and 2) should partner with schools to learn about their processes of adaptation and adoption in order to facilitate successful implementation of evidence-based practices for children with ASD. Interventions designed with implementation in mind may be more feasible and increase the chances of use in schools.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Res Autism Spectr Disord Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Res Autism Spectr Disord Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Netherlands