Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adaptability of the load sharing between the longissimus and components of the multifidus muscle during isometric trunk extension in healthy individuals.
Tier, Louise; Salomoni, Sauro E; Hug, François; Besomi, Manuela; Hodges, Paul W.
Affiliation
  • Tier L; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
  • Salomoni SE; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
  • Hug F; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
  • Besomi M; LAMHESS, Université Côte d'azur, Nice, France.
  • Hodges PW; Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 123(9): 1879-1893, 2023 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079082
PURPOSE: Redundancy of the musculoskeletal system implies multiple strategies are theoretically available to coordinate back extensor muscles. This study investigated whether coordination between back muscles during a tightly constrained isometric trunk extension task varies within and between individuals, and whether this changes following brief exposure to activation feedback of a muscle. METHODS: Nine healthy participants performed three blocks of two repetitions of ramped isometric trunk extension in side-lying against resistance from 0-30% of maximum voluntary contraction over 30 s (force feedback). Between blocks, participants repeated contractions with visual feedback of electromyography (EMG) from either superficial (SM) or deep multifidus (DM), in two conditions; 'After SM' and 'After DM'. Intramuscular EMG was recorded from SM, DM, and longissimus (LG) simultaneously with shear wave elastography (SWE) from SM or DM. RESULTS: In the 'Natural' condition (force feedback only), group data showed incremental increases in EMG with force, with minor changes in distribution of activation between muscles as force increased. SM was the most active muscle during the 'Natural' condition, but with DM most active in some participants. Individual data showed that coordination between muscles differed substantially between repetitions and individuals. Brief exposure to EMG feedback altered coordination. SWE showed individual variation, but findings differed from EMG. CONCLUSION: This study revealed substantial variation in coordination between back extensor muscles within and between participants, and after exposure to feedback, in a tightly constrained task. Shear modulus revealed similar variation, but with an inconsistent relationship to EMG. These data highlight highly flexible control of back muscles.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain / Back Muscles Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Low Back Pain / Back Muscles Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: Germany