Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical benefits and economic cost-savings of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention.
Cowan, Robert; Stark-Inbar, Alit; Rabany, Liron; Harris, Dagan; Vizel, Maya; Ironi, Alon; Vieira, Julio R; Galen, Michelle; Treppendahl, Christina.
Affiliation
  • Cowan R; Division of Headache Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Stark-Inbar A; Theranica Ltd., Netanya, Israel.
  • Rabany L; Theranica Ltd., Netanya, Israel.
  • Harris D; Theranica Ltd., Netanya, Israel.
  • Vizel M; Theranica Ltd., Netanya, Israel.
  • Ironi A; Theranica Ltd., Netanya, Israel.
  • Vieira JR; Nuvance Health Neuroscience Institute, Kingston, NY, USA.
  • Galen M; Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
  • Treppendahl C; Deaconess Research Institute, Newburgh, IN, USA.
J Med Econ ; 26(1): 656-664, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37083448
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Assess the clinical benefits and associated direct and indirect cost-savings from Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention.

METHODS:

REN, a prescribed, wearable, FDA-cleared neuromodulation-device for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine, recently demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention when used every-other-day, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study. Following baseline (4-weeks), subjects underwent treatment with REN or placebo (8-weeks), and electronically reported migraine symptoms and acute treatments daily. Therapeutic-gain was the between-groups difference (REN minus placebo) in change from baseline to the second month of intervention. Health-economics impact was derived as cost-savings associated with REN's clinical benefits.

RESULTS:

Out of 248 subjects randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), 179 (9584) qualified for modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Significant therapeutic gains favoring REN vs. placebo were found (Tepper et al. 2023), including mean (±SD) reduction in number of acute medication days (3.5 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5; gain = 2.2; p = .001) and presenteeism days (2.7 ± 0.3 vs. 1.1 ± 0.4; gain = 1.6, p = .001). Mean changes of provider visits (reduction of 0.09 ± 0.1 vs. increase of 0.08 ± 0.2; p = .297), and reduction of absenteeism days (0.07 ± 0.1 vs. 0.07 ± 0.2; p = .997) were not significant. Mean annual cost-saving for one patient using REN for migraine prevention estimated $10,000 (±$1,777) from reductions in these four clinical outcomes relative to baseline without REN treatment. Extrapolated to a hypothetical US commercial health-plan of one-million covered lives, assuming the national prevalence of migraine patients on preventive treatment, annual mean (±SE) cost-saving from using REN migraine prevention estimated $560.0 million (±$99.5 million) from reduction in direct (∼$330 millionm) and indirect costs (∼$230 millionm) measured.

LIMITATIONS:

Clinical and cost-savings benefits presented are conservative, assessed only from endpoints measured in the clinical trial. Moreover, some of the endpoints had only scarce or no occurrences during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS:

Coverage of the REN-device for migraine prevention may significantly reduce disease-burden and save a one-million-member payer plan at least $560 million per year.
Migraine affects more than 1 billion people worldwide, causing significant disability and substantial clinical economic burden. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) is a prescribed, wearable, non-pharmacological, non-invasive device (Nerivio), indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years and older. Efficacy of REN for migraine prevention was recently demonstrated in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical-trial. This study further analyzes clinical benefits from endpoints measured in the clinical-trial as well as their associated direct and indirect costs. Out of 248 subjects randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), 179 (9584) qualified for modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Significant therapeutic gains favoring REN over placebo were found, including an average reduction of 3.4 acute medication days/month, and an average reduction of 2.7 presenteeism days/month. A reduction in the number of provider visits and absenteeism days was also reported, though not significantly differed from changes in the control group. Mean annual cost-saving from reductions in these four clinical outcomes relative to baseline without REN treatment for a patient using REN for migraine prevention estimated $10,000. Extrapolated to a hypothetical US commercial health-plan of one million covered lives, annual mean cost-saving from using REN for migraine prevention is estimated to be $560.0 million, composed of $327.8 million direct costs and $232.2 million indirect costs. Thus, REN preventive treatment for migraine reduces disease burden and leads to meaningful cost-saving, both direct and indirect, proposing clinical and financial incentives for patients, health insurance systems, and employers to utilize REN for migraine prevention.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Migraine Disorders Type of study: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Med Econ Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Migraine Disorders Type of study: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Med Econ Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States