Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Preoperative Ureteral Stenting in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urolithiasis.
Jeong, Jae Yong; Cho, Kang Su; Jun, Dae Young; Moon, Young Joon; Kang, Dong Hyuk; Jung, Hae Do; Lee, Joo Yong.
Affiliation
  • Jeong JY; Department of Urology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang 10444, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho KS; Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.
  • Jun DY; Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
  • Moon YJ; Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang DH; Department of Urology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung HD; Department of Urology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang 10380, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JY; Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(4)2023 Apr 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37109702
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Ureteral stent insertion passively dilates the ureter. Therefore, it is sometimes used preoperatively before flexible ureterorenoscopy to make the ureter more accessible and facilitate urolithiasis passage, especially when ureteroscopic access has failed or when the ureter is expected to be tight. However, it may cause stent-related discomfort and complications. This study aimed to assess the effect of ureteral stenting prior to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and

Methods:

Data from patients who underwent unilateral RIRS for renal stone with the use of a ureteral access sheath from January 2016 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, presence of hydronephrosis, and treated side, were recorded. Stone characteristics in terms of maximal stone length, modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score, and stone composition were evaluated. Surgical outcomes, including operative time, complication rate, and stone-free rate, were compared between two groups divided by whether preoperative stenting was performed.

Results:

Of the 260 patients enrolled in this study, 106 patients had no preoperative stenting (stentless group), and 154 patients had stenting (stenting group). Patient characteristics except for the presence of hydronephrosis and stone composition were not statistically different between the two groups. In surgical outcomes, the stone-free rate was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.901); however, the operation time for the stenting group was longer than that of the stentless group (44.8 ± 24.2 vs. 36.1 ± 17.6 min; p = 0.001). There were no differences in the complication rate between the two groups (p = 0.523).

Conclusions:

Among surgical outcomes for RIRS with a ureteral access sheath, preoperative ureteral stenting does not provide a significant advantage over non-stenting with respect to the stone-free rate and complication rate.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ureter / Kidney Calculi / Urolithiasis / Hydronephrosis Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ureter / Kidney Calculi / Urolithiasis / Hydronephrosis Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2023 Document type: Article
...