Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management Patterns for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Impact of a Patient Decision Aid.
Sadik, Joshua E; Lambrechts, Sylvia; Kwan, Lorna; Liu, Hui; Shirk, Joseph; Weiser, Casey Elizabeth; Saigal, Christopher.
Affiliation
  • Sadik JE; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Lambrechts S; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kwan L; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Liu H; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Shirk J; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Weiser CE; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Saigal C; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Urol Pract ; 8(4): 523-528, 2021 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37145463
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Decision aids aimed at men with benign prostatic hyperplasia used in clinical trials have decreased the use of procedures and affected elements of decisional quality. We employed an online, interactive decision aid for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia as a routine part of care with a urologist and tracked subsequent treatment choice. We further evaluated the role of patient preferences on treatment selection.

METHODS:

Men scheduled for a new patient visit with a urologist for benign prostatic hyperplasia at a single tertiary care center were invited to use a decision aid prior to their visit. We compared treatment patterns in men who used the decision aid to a usual care group identified prior to the decision aid's introduction. Latent class analysis identified clusters of patients by their treatment preferences, which were then compared to their treatment choice.

RESULTS:

The rate of procedures in the decision aid group was significantly lower than in the usual care group (6% vs 15%; p=0.0250), matching the rates reporting a procedure as their preferred treatment choice in the post-consult questionnaire (5% vs 15%; p=0.0082). Of the patients in our project 36% had never tried an alpha blocker prior to their urology consult. Latent class analysis found 2 clusters of patient preferences but without a significant association with final treatment selection.

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of a decision aid was associated with a significant decrease in procedural management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. A high proportion of patients were evaluated by urologists without exhausting primary care management options.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Urol Pract Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Urol Pract Year: 2021 Document type: Article
...