Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health Insurance Coverage and Survival Outcomes among Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A SEER Retrospective Analysis.
Diaz, Ashley; Bujnowski, Daniel; Chen, Haobin; Pendergrast, Keaton; Horowitz, Peleg; Das, Paramita; Roxbury, Christopher.
Affiliation
  • Diaz A; Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
  • Bujnowski D; Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, United States.
  • Chen H; Program in Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
  • Pendergrast K; University of Minnesota Medical School - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
  • Horowitz P; Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
  • Das P; Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
  • Roxbury C; Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base ; 84(3): 240-247, 2023 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37180866
Objectives Insurance coverage plays a critical role in head and neck cancer care. This retrospective study examines how insurance coverage affects nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) survival in the United States using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Design, Setting, and Participants A total of 2,278 patients aged 20 to 64 years according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) codes C11.0-C11.9 and ICD-O histology codes 8070-8078 and 8080-8083 between 2007 and 2016 were included and grouped into privately insured, Medicaid, and uninsured groups. Log-rank test and multivariable Cox's proportional hazard model were performed. Main Outcome Measures Tumor stage, age, sex, race, marital status, disease stage, year of diagnosis, median household county income, and disease-specific survival outcomes including cause of death were analyzed. Results Across all tumor stages, privately insured patients had a 59.0% lower mortality risk than uninsured patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.410, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.320, 0.526], p < 0.01). Medicaid patients were also estimated to have 19.0% lower mortality than uninsured patients (HR: 0.810, 95% CI: [0.626, 1.048], p = 0.108). Privately insured patients with regional and distant NPC had significantly better survival outcomes compared with uninsured individuals. Localized tumors did not show any association between survival and type of insurance coverage. Conclusion Privately insured individuals had significantly better survival outcomes than uninsured or Medicaid patients, a trend that was preserved after accounting for tumor grade, demographic and clinicopathologic factors. These results underscore the difference in survival outcomes when comparing privately insured to Medicaid/uninsured populations and warrant further investigation in efforts for health care reform.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Germany