Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review.
Haghbin, Hossein; Zakirkhodjaev, Nuruddinkhodja; Aziz, Muhammad.
Affiliation
  • Haghbin H; Division of Gastroenterology, Ascension Providence Hospital, Southfield, MI, USA.
  • Zakirkhodjaev N; Department of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Aziz M; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37197256
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objective:

Colonoscopy is a time proven, safe, and gold standard screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to achieve its objectives, quality markers have been defined for colonoscopy, including withdrawal time (WT). WT is defined as the time spent from reaching the cecum or terminal ileum till the end of procedure in colonoscopies without any additional interventions. This review aims to provide evidence on WT efficacy and future directions.

Methods:

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of articles evaluating WT. Search was limited to English language articles from all peer-reviewed journals. Key Content and

Findings:

The seminal study by Barclay et al., led to setting of a minimum WT of 6 minutes as the recommended amount for colonoscopy, per 2006 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) taskforce. Since then, many observational studies have confirmed the efficacy of 6 minutes. Recently, multiple large multicenter trials suggest WT of 9 minutes as the alternative for better outcomes. Recently, novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have shown promise in improving WT and other outcomes and proved an exciting tool in the armamentarium of gastroenterologists. Some of these tools encourage the endoscopists to check the blind spots and clean the residual stool. This has shown to improve both WT and ADR. We recommend an improvement of these models to consider risk factors like adenoma detection in current and prior scopes to guide endoscopists spend time in each segment.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, new evidence demonstrates that WT of 9 minutes is better than 6 minutes. Future trends point toward an individualized AI-based approach combining real time and baseline data and guiding the endoscopist on how much time to spend in every segment of the colon in every colonoscopy procedure.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States