Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Academic misconduct: results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys.
J Allied Health ; 15(2): 129-42, 1986 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3721993
Educators in health-related fields are particularly sensitive to academic misconduct because undergraduate students who falsify academic work in such fields can go on to endanger the health and well being of the very people they are meant to assist. This paper presents the results of a survey of 104 faculty and 314 undergraduate students regarding their experience with academic misconduct. Faculty and student definitions of misconduct are compared, the incidence of cheating within each category is reported, and the projected efficacy of methods for controlling misconduct are examined. Major findings include the following: faculty and students differed significantly in their definitions of 24 of the 36 described behaviors, 82% of the surveyed undergraduate students admitted to engaging in some form of academic misconduct during their college careers, few differences in cheating patterns were related to year in school (class) or gender, and faculty and students differed on the impact that changes in environment and procedure were expected to have on cheating.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students / Behavior / Ethics / Faculty Aspects: Ethics Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Allied Health Year: 1986 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students / Behavior / Ethics / Faculty Aspects: Ethics Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Allied Health Year: 1986 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States