Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey of South Carolina pharmacists' readiness to prescribe human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Burns, Charles M; Endres, Kyle; Derrick, Caroline; Cooper, Alexandra; Fabel, Patricia; Okeke, Nwora Lance; Ahuja, Divya; Corneli, Amy; McKellar, Mehri S.
Affiliation
  • Burns CM; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • Endres K; Center for Social and Behavioral Research, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, United States of America.
  • Derrick C; School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
  • Cooper A; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of South Carolina, Prisma Health-Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
  • Fabel P; Duke Initiative on Survey Methodology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • Okeke NL; Kennedy Pharmacy Innovation Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
  • Ahuja D; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • Corneli A; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of South Carolina, Prisma Health-Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
  • McKellar MS; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
J Am Coll Clin Pharm ; 6(4): 329-338, 2023 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37251085
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is largely underutilized in the Southern United States. Given their community presence, pharmacists are well positioned to provide PrEP within rural, Southern regions. However, pharmacists' readiness to prescribe PrEP in these communities remains unknown.

Objective:

To determine the perceived feasibility and acceptability of prescribing PrEP by pharmacists in South Carolina (SC).

Methods:

We distributed a 43-question online descriptive survey through the University of SC Kennedy Pharmacy Innovation Center's listerv of licensed SC pharmacists. We assessed pharmacists' comfort, knowledge, and readiness to provide PrEP.

Results:

A total of 150 pharmacists responded to the survey. The majority were White (73%, n=110), female (62%, n=93), and non-Hispanic (83%, n=125). Pharmacists practiced in retail (25%, n=37), hospital (22%, n=33), independent (17%, n=25), community (13%, n=19), specialty (6%, n=9), and academic settings (3%, n=4); 11% (n=17) practiced in rural locales. Pharmacists viewed PrEP as both effective (97%, n=122/125) and beneficial (74% n=97/131) for their clients. Many pharmacists reported being ready (60% n=79/130) and willing (86% n=111/129) to prescribe PrEP, although over half (62% n=73/118) cited lack of PrEP knowledge as a barrier. Pharmacists described pharmacies as an appropriate location to prescribe PrEP (72% n=97/134).

Conclusions:

Most SC pharmacists surveyed considered PrEP to be effective and beneficial for individuals who frequent their pharmacy and are willing to prescribe this therapy if statewide statutes allow. Many felt that pharmacies are an appropriate location to prescribe PrEP but lack a complete understanding of required protocols to manage these patients. Further investigation into facilitators and barriers of pharmacy-driven PrEP are needed to enhance utilization within communities.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: J Am Coll Clin Pharm Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: J Am Coll Clin Pharm Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...