CEST 2022 - Differences in APT-weighted signal in T1 weighted isointense lesions, black holes and normal-appearing white matter in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) signal differences between multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions and contralateral normal-appearing white matter (cNAWM). Cellular changes during the demyelination process were also assessed by comparing APTw signal intensity in T1weighted isointense (ISO) and hypointense (black hole -BH) MS lesions in relation to cNAWM. METHODS: Twenty-four people with relapsing-remitting MS (pw-RRMS) on stable therapy were recruited. MRI/APTw acquisitions were undertaken on a 3 T MRI scanner. The pre and post-processing, analysis, co-registration with structural MRI maps, and identification of regions of interest (ROIs) were all performed with Olea Sphere 3.0 software. Generalized linear model (GLM) univariate ANOVA was undertaken to test the hypotheses that differences in mean APTw were entered as dependent variables. ROIs were entered as random effect variables, which allowed all data to be included. Regions (lesions and cNAWM) and/or structure (ISO and BH) were the main factor variables. The models also included age, sex, disease duration, EDSS, and ROI volumes as covariates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of these comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 502 MS lesions manually identified on T2-FLAIR from twenty-four pw-RRMS were subcategorized as 359 ISO and 143 BH with reference to the T1-MPRAGE cerebral cortex signal. Also, 490 ROIs of cNAWM were manually delineated to match the MS lesion positions. A two-tailed t-test showed that mean APTw values were higher in females than in males (t = 3.52, p < 0.001). Additionally, the mean APTw values of MS lesions were higher than those of cNAWM after accounting for covariates (mean lesion = 0.44, mean cNAWM = 0.13, F = 44.12, p < 0.001).The mean APTw values of ISO lesions were higher than those of cNAWM after accounting for covariates (mean ISO lesions = 0.42, mean cNAWM = 0.21, F = 12.12, p < 0.001). The mean APTw values of BH were also higher than those of cNAWM (mean BH lesions = 0.47, mean cNAWM = 0.033, F = 40.3, p < 0.001). The effect size (i.e., difference between lesion and cNAWM) for BH was found to be higher than for ISO (14 vs. 2). Diagnostic performance showed that APT was able to discriminate between all lesions and cNAWM with an accuracy of >75% (AUC = 0.79, SE = 0.014). Discrimination between ISO lesions and cNAWM was accomplished with an accuracy of >69% (AUC = 0.74, SE = 0.018), while discrimination between BH lesions and cNAWM was achieved at an accuracy of >80% (AUC = 0.87, SE = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the potential of APTw imaging for use as a non-invasive technique that is able to provide essential molecular information to clinicians and researchers so that the stages of inflammation and degeneration in MS lesions can be better characterized.