Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"Quantifying the Impact of Prepectoral Implant Conversion on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life".
Seitz, Allison J; MacKenzie, Ethan L; Edalatpour, Armin; Janssen, David A; Doubek Iii, William G; Afifi, Ahmed M.
Affiliation
  • Seitz AJ; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • MacKenzie EL; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Edalatpour A; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Janssen DA; Fox Valley Plastic Surgery, Oshkosh, Wisconsin.
  • Doubek Iii WG; Fox Valley Plastic Surgery, Oshkosh, Wisconsin.
  • Afifi AM; Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 2023 Jun 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335561
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Conversion of subpectoral reconstruction to the prepectoral plane has been increasing in popularity. However, there is a paucity of research assessing patient-reported outcomes following this operation. The primary aim of this study is to examine patient-reported outcomes following conversion of implants from the subpectoral to prepectoral plane through utilization of the BREAST-Q.

METHODS:

We retrospectively examined patients who underwent subpectoral to prepectoral implant conversion by three surgeons at two separate centers from 2017-2021. Patient demographics, primary indication for the conversion, surgical characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and BREAST-Qs were obtained.

RESULTS:

Sixty-eight breasts in 39 patients underwent implant conversion. The most common primary indications for implant conversion were chronic pain (41%), animation deformity (30%), and cosmetic concerns (27%). Average BREAST-Q scores improved significantly preoperatively to postoperatively in all the domains measured ("satisfaction with breasts", "satisfaction with implants", "physical well-being," "psychosocial well-being," and "sexual well-being") (p<0.01). When examined by primary indication, all cohorts had significant preoperative to postoperative score improvement in "satisfaction with breasts" (p<0.001) and "physical well-being" (p<0.01) domains. Fifteen breasts (22%) developed postoperative complications, with implant loss in 9% of breasts.

CONCLUSIONS:

Conversion of subpectoral implants to the prepectoral plane significantly improves BREAST-Q outcomes in all aspects, including patient satisfaction with breasts and implants, as well as psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being. Implant conversion to the prepectoral plane in now becoming our primary solution to most patients with chronic pain, animation deformity or cosmetic concerns after subpectoral reconstruction.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Year: 2023 Document type: Article