Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer With Greater than Serosal Invasion Depth.
Kanaji, Shingo; Urakawa, Naoki; Mukoyama, Tomosuke; Harada, Hitoshi; Kato, Takashi; Goto, Hironobu; Yamashita, Kimihiro; Matsuda, Takeru; Oshikiri, Taro; Kakeji, Yoshihiro.
Affiliation
  • Kanaji S; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan kanashin@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.
  • Urakawa N; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
  • Mukoyama T; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
  • Harada H; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
  • Kato T; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
  • Goto H; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
  • Yamashita K; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
  • Matsuda T; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
  • Oshikiri T; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
  • Kakeji Y; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Anticancer Res ; 43(7): 3145-3152, 2023 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37351963
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIM:

There are several concerns about oncological contamination and technical difficulty in the laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer. We aimed to determine the safety and usefulness of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer with tumor depth greater than serosal invasion. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Sixty-two laparoscopic and 82 laparotomy gastric cancer cases surgically diagnosed as serosal or other organ invasions intraoperatively between 2011 and 2021 were included. The laparoscopic and open gastrectomy results were compared by propensity score matching using stage, preoperative chemotherapy, curative resection, surgical technique, and age as explanatory variables and laparoscopy and open resection as outcome variables.

RESULTS:

No difference in median operative time (341 vs. 386 minutes, p=0.24) was observed, but median blood loss (0 vs. 510 ml, p<0.001) and blood transfusion requirement (9.5 vs. 43%, p<0.001) were lower in the laparoscopic group. No difference was observed between the two groups regarding complications. Furthermore, 3-year overall survival was also similar (43 vs. 42%, p=0.74).

CONCLUSION:

The laparoscopic surgery results are comparable to those of open surgery in treating gastric cancer with T4a or greater depth. In addition, it is minimally invasive with less blood loss, making it a standard approach.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / Laparoscopy Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Anticancer Res Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms / Laparoscopy Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Anticancer Res Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan
...