Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Longitudinal Study of Bone Height Change between Two Approaches for Sinus Floor Elevation.
Park, Jun-Hyeong; Kim, Yong-Gun; Suh, Jo-Young; Lee, Du-Hyeong; Kim, Jin-Wook; Lee, Jae-Mok.
Affiliation
  • Park JH; Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YG; Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea.
  • Suh JY; Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee DH; Department of Prosthodontics, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JW; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JM; Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(6)2023 Jun 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37374336
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term maintenance of each approach of sinus elevation, the crestal approach and lateral approach, by comparing the radiographic results of each technique. Materials and

Methods:

In total, 103 patients who had undergone an implant procedure with either the crestal approach or lateral approach method applied to their maxillary molar edentulous area were included. Using orthopantomographs, the radiographic changes were consistently evaluated over 3 years after the procedure (immediately after procedure and 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after implant placement)

Results:

The radiographic evaluation after 3 years of implantation with sinus elevation showed a significant amount of bone formation (8.07 mm for crestal approach and 12.00 mm for lateral approach method). The largest amount of grafted height loss occurred during the 1 year, but the resorption was minimal (0.98 mm for crestal approach and 0.95 mm for lateral approach method) over the entire 3 years.

Conclusions:

Although the lateral approach showed more bone growth, the amount of bone resorption was similar to that of the crestal approach. Both methods showed the highest amount of bone resorption in the first year, and the amount of change thereafter was insignificant. It is judged that both methods can be used according to the situation to help implant placement.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Alveolar Bone Loss / Sinus Floor Augmentation Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Alveolar Bone Loss / Sinus Floor Augmentation Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2023 Document type: Article