Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Costs of complications following distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review.
van Bodegraven, Eduard A; Francken, Michiel F G; Verkoulen, Koen C H A; Abu Hilal, Mohammad; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G W; Besselink, Marc G.
Affiliation
  • van Bodegraven EA; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: e.a.vanbodegraven@amsterdamUMC.nl.
  • Francken MFG; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Verkoulen KCHA; Department of Surgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Abu Hilal M; Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
  • Dijkgraaf MGW; Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Besselink MG; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.g.besselink@amsterdamUMC.nl.
HPB (Oxford) ; 25(10): 1145-1150, 2023 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37391314
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Postoperative complications following distal pancreatectomy (DP) are common, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). In order to design adequate prophylactic strategies, it is of relevance to determine the costs of these complications. An overview of the literature on the costs of complications following DP is lacking.

METHODS:

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (inception until 1 August 2022). The primary outcome was the costs (i.e. cost differential) of major morbidity, individual complications and prolonged hospital stay. Quality of non-RCTs were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Costs were compared with the use of Purchasing Power parity. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021223019).

RESULTS:

Overall, seven studies were included with 854 patients after DP. The rate POPF grade B/C varied between 13% and 27% (based on five studies) with a corresponding cost differential of EUR 18,389 (based on two studies). The rate of severe morbidity varied between 13% and 38% (based on five studies) with a corresponding cost differential of EUR 19,281 (based on five studies).

CONCLUSION:

This systematic review reported considerable costs for POPF grade B/C and severe morbidity after DP. Prospective databases and studies should report on all complications in a uniform matter to better display the economic burden of complications of DP.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreas / Pancreatectomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: HPB (Oxford) Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreas / Pancreatectomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: HPB (Oxford) Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article