Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost minimization analysis of short-duration antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis C positive donor kidney transplants.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 63(6): 1700-1705.e4, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37414279
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Trials describing 4-12 week courses of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission from infected donors to uninfected kidney transplant recipients (D+/R-transplants), may be limited in application by costs and delayed access to expensive DAAs. A short prophylactic strategy may be safer and cost-effective. Here, we report a cost minimization analysis using the health system perspective to determine the least expensive DAA regimen, using available published strategies.

OBJECTIVES:

To conduct cost-minimization analyses (CMAs) from the health system perspective of four DAA regimens to prevent and/or treat HCV transmission from D+/R-kidney transplants.

METHODS:

CMAs comparing 4 strategies 1) 7-day prophylaxis with generic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), with 12-week branded glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for those with transmission; 2) 8-day branded G/P prophylaxis, with 12-week branded SOF/VEL/voxilaprevir for those with transmission; 3) 4-week perioperative generic SOF/VEL prophylaxis, with 12-week branded G/P for those with transmission; and 4) 8-week branded G/P "transmit-and-treat." We included data from published literature to estimate the probability of viral transmission in patients who received DAA prophylaxis, and assumed a 100% transmission rate for those who received the "transmit-and-treat" approach.

RESULTS:

In base-case analyses, strategies 1 (expected cost [EC] $2326) and 2 (expected cost $2646) were less expensive than strategies 3 (EC $4859) and 4 (EC $18,525). Threshold analyses for 7-day SOF/VEL versus 8-day G/P suggested that there were reasonable input levels at which the 8-day strategy may be least costly. The threshold values for the SOF/VEL prophylaxis strategies (7-day vs. 4- week) indicated that the 4-week strategy is unlikely to be less costly under any reasonable value of the input variables.

CONCLUSIONS:

Short duration DAA prophylaxis using 7 days of SOF/VEL or 8 days of G/P has the potential to yield significant cost savings for D+/R- kidney transplants.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Hepatitis C / Hepatitis C, Chronic Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) Journal subject: FARMACIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Hepatitis C / Hepatitis C, Chronic Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) Journal subject: FARMACIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article
...