Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Telehealth palliative care interventions for patients with advanced cancer: a scoping review.
Mathews, Jean Jacob; Chow, Ronald; Wennberg, Erica; Lau, Jenny; Hannon, Breffni; Zimmermann, Camilla.
Affiliation
  • Mathews JJ; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine and Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Chow R; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 620 University Ave, 12-300, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C1, Canada.
  • Wennberg E; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Lau J; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hannon B; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zimmermann C; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 620 University Ave, 12-300, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C1, Canada.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(8): 451, 2023 Jul 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37421447
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Telehealth allows patients to maintain contact with healthcare providers without necessitating travel, and is becoming increasingly utilized. The purpose of this study is to describe the components of telehealth palliative care interventions for patients with advanced cancer before the COVID-19 pandemic; identify any intervention components associated with improvements in outcomes; and evaluate reporting of interventions.

METHODS:

This scoping review was registered on the Open Science Framework. We searched 5 medical databases from inception to June 19, 2020. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18, advanced cancer, asynchronous or synchronous telehealth intervention, and specialized palliative care interventions in any setting. We assessed the quality of intervention reporting using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.

RESULTS:

Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria 15 (65%) quantitative (7 randomized controlled trials, 5 feasibility trials, 3 retrospective chart reviews); 4 (17%) mixed methods, and 4 (17%) qualitative. Most quantitative and mixed methods studies were conducted in North America (12/19, 63%), reported on hybrid (in-person and telehealth) interventions (9/19, 47%), and were delivered by nurses (12/19, 63%) in the home setting (14/19, 74%). In most studies that reported improvements in patient- or caregiver-reported outcomes, the content was psychoeducational and resulted in improvements for psychological symptoms. No study provided complete reporting on all 12 TIDieR checklist items.

CONCLUSION:

Telehealth studies are needed that reflect palliative care's mission to provide multidisciplinary team-based care that improves quality of life in diverse settings, and that provide detailed reporting of interventions.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Support Care Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Support Care Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada
...