Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of two different intravitreal treatment regimens combined with systemic antiviral therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS.
Liang, Xuemei; An, Hongmei; He, Huawei; Shen, Baiyun; Ou, Zuguo; Li, Li.
Affiliation
  • Liang X; Department of Fundus Disease, Nanning Aier Eye Hospital, Nanning City, China.
  • An H; Department of Fundus Disease, Nanning Aier Eye Hospital, Nanning City, China.
  • He H; Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fourth Hospital of Nanning, Nanning City, China.
  • Shen B; Department of Fundus Disease, Nanning Aier Eye Hospital, Nanning City, China.
  • Ou Z; Department of Fundus Disease, Nanning Aier Eye Hospital, Nanning City, China.
  • Li L; Department of Fundus Disease, Nanning Aier Eye Hospital, Nanning City, China. lxmyanke@163.com.
AIDS Res Ther ; 20(1): 46, 2023 07 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37452370
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the efficacy and injection frequency of intravitreal low-dose vs. intermediate-dose ganciclovir therapy in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients exhibiting cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR).

METHODS:

A prospective, single-centre, double-blinded, randomized controlled interventional study was conducted. Fifty patients with a total of 67 included eyes were randomly divided into low-dose (0.4 mg ganciclovir per week) and intermediate-dose (1.0 mg ganciclovir per week) groups. The primary clinical outcomes were the changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to the end of treatment and the 12-month follow-up visit as well as the number of intravitreal injections.

RESULTS:

In both groups, the median BCVA, expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), improved significantly from baseline to the end of treatment (both p < 0.001), while vision loss from CMVR continued to occur at the 12-month visit. The mean number of injections was 5.8 in the low-dose group and 5.4 in the intermediate-dose group. No significant differences were detected between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regarding the location of CMVR, we found that Zone I lesions led to a worse visual outcome, more injections and a higher occurrence rate of complications than lesions in other zones (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The efficacy and frequency of injections to treat CMVR in AIDS patients were not significantly different between low and intermediate doses. Zone I lesions were associated with a worse visual outcome, more injections and a higher occurrence rate of CMVR-related complications than lesions in other zones.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: HIV Infections / Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: AIDS Res Ther Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: HIV Infections / Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: AIDS Res Ther Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China