Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Térémetz, Maxime; Hamdoun, Sonia; Colle, Florence; Gerardin, Eloïse; Desvilles, Claire; Carment, Loïc; Charron, Sylvain; Cuenca, Macarena; Calvet, David; Baron, Jean-Claude; Turc, Guillaume; Maier, Marc A; Rosso, Charlotte; Mas, Jean-Louis; Lindberg, Påvel G.
Affiliation
  • Térémetz M; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, 102-108 Rue de La Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Hamdoun S; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, 102-108 Rue de La Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Colle F; Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris, Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, 1 Rue Cabanis, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Gerardin E; SSR Neurologique, Hôpitaux de Saint-Maurice, 12/14 Rue du Val d'Osne, 94410, Saint-Maurice, France.
  • Desvilles C; Neurology Department, Stroke Unit, UCLouvain/CHU UCL Namur (Godinne), Yvoir, Belgium.
  • Carment L; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, 102-108 Rue de La Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Charron S; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, 102-108 Rue de La Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Cuenca M; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, 102-108 Rue de La Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Calvet D; Centre de Recherche Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris, Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, 1 Rue Cabanis, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Baron JC; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, 102-108 Rue de La Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Turc G; Service de Neurologie, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris, Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, 1 Rue Cabanis, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Maier MA; FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France.
  • Rosso C; Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, 102-108 Rue de La Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Mas JL; Service de Neurologie, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris, Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, 1 Rue Cabanis, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Lindberg PG; FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 20(1): 93, 2023 07 18.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37464404
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke.

METHODS:

A prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-phase post-stroke patients with mild-to-moderate dexterity impairment (Box and Block Test (BBT) > 1) received 12 sessions of Dextrain or CT. Blinded measures were obtained before and after training and at 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was BBT-change (after-before training). Secondary outcomes included changes in motor impairments, activity limitations and dexterity components. Corticospinal excitability and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

RESULTS:

BBT-change after training did not differ between the Dextrain (N = 21) vs CT group (N = 21) (median [IQR] = 5[2-7] vs 4[2-7], respectively; P = 0.36). Gains in BBT were maintained at the 3-month post-training follow-up, with a non-significant trend for enhanced BBT-change in the Dextrain group (median [IQR] = 3[- 1-7.0], P = 0.06). Several secondary outcomes showed significantly larger changes in the Dextrain group finger tracking precision (mean ± SD = 0.3 ± 0.3N vs - 0.1 ± 0.33N; P < 0.0018), independent finger movements (34.7 ± 25.1 ms vs 7.7 ± 18.5 ms, P = 0.02) and maximal finger tapping speed (8.4 ± 7.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.045). At follow-up, Dextrain group showed significantly greater improvement in Motor Activity Log (median/IQR = 0.7/0.2-0.8 vs 0.2/0.1-0.6, P = 0.05). Across both groups SICI increased in patients with greater BBT-change (Rho = 0.80, P = 0.006). Comparing Dextrain subgroups with maximal grip force higher/lower than median (61.2%), BBT-change was significantly larger in patients with low vs high grip force (7.5 ± 5.6 vs 2.9 ± 2.8; respectively, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although immediate improvements in gross dexterity post-stroke did not significantly differ between Dextrain training and CT, our findings suggest that Dextrain enhances recovery of several dexterity components and reported hand-use, particularly when motor impairment is moderate (low initial grip force). Findings need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934073 (retrospectively registered).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stroke / Stroke Rehabilitation Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Journal subject: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / NEUROLOGIA / REABILITACAO Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stroke / Stroke Rehabilitation Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Journal subject: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / NEUROLOGIA / REABILITACAO Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France