Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of efficacy of conbercept, aflibercept, and ranibizumab ophthalmic injection in the treatment of macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion: a Meta-analysis.
Xing, Qiu; Dai, Ya-Nan; Huang, Xiao-Bo; Peng, Li.
Affiliation
  • Xing Q; Department of Ophthalmology, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital, Haikou 570000, Hainan Province, China.
  • Dai YN; Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan Province, China.
  • Huang XB; Department of Ophthalmology, the Changsha Central Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha 410004, Hunan Province, China.
  • Peng L; Department of Ophthalmology, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital, Haikou 570000, Hainan Province, China.
Int J Ophthalmol ; 16(7): 1145-1154, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37465496
AIM: To evaluate and compare the anatomical and functional outcomes and negative effects of the three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs in the treatment of macular edema (ME) due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) based on the evidence pooled from current clinical trials and observational studies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on nine online databases from inception until April 30, 2022. The main endpoints were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and adverse events (AEs). Cumulative Meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the outcomes of the drugs. The retrieved data were analyzed using Stata software (version 12.0). RESULTS: A total of 20 studies comprising 1674 eyes met the inclusion criteria to the Meta-analysis. It was observed that conbercept and aflibercept had better visual acuity effects compared with ranibizumab at 1mo [weight mean difference (WMD)=-0.03, P=0.001; WMD=-0.05, P=0.019], but the effects were not different from that of ranibizumab at 6mo. Moreover, there was not statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients gaining ≥15 letters at 12-24mo between aflibercept and ranibizumab [odds ratio (OR)=1.16, P=0.427]. Conbercept had higher mean CMT change effects at 1mo (WMD=-14.43, P=0.014) and 6mo (WMD=-35.63, P≤0.001) compared with ranibizumab. Meanwhile, the mean CMT change effects at 1mo (WMD=-10.14, P=0.170), 6mo (WMD=-26.98, P=0.140) and 12-24mo (WMD=-12.34, P=0.071) were comparable among the groups. Similarly, AEs were not significantly different among the treatments (OR=0.75, P=0.305; OR=1.04, P=0.89). The stability of effect size of mean BCVA and CMT improved with the increase in sample size. Aflibercept and conbercept required fewer injections compared with ranibizumab. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and AEs of intravitreal administration of conbercept, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in the treatment of RVO-ME. Intravitreal aflibercept or conbercept results in better mean change in vision and CMT reduction compared with ranibizumab. Conbercept can be considered to be a promising and innovative drug with good anti-VEGF effects.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: China