The effect of Paenibacillus on IDEXX Enterolert results from freshwater stream environments.

ABSTRACT

Enterolert, a fluorogenic substrate test, is used as a quantitative method for determining freshwater concentrations of Enterococcus for water quality indicators. However, there is some evidence from recent studies suggesting that Enterolert may not suppress false positives due to pollution sources in waterbodies. In this study, we evaluated this method by analyzing field water and sediment samples from four freshwater streams. We also performed a laboratory microcosm study from two of the stream sediments. The Enterolert method was investigated by phenotypic and genomic analyses for accuracy of isolating and quantifying Enterococcus and/or Streptococcus. Additionally, we tested isolates from Enterolert panels for antibiotic resistance. Results from the field and microcosm studies from initial to final time points indicated that false positives were predominantly Paenibacillus spp. and other non-fecal indicator bacteria. Furthermore, the microcosm study indicated shifts from lactic acid to non-lactic acid bacteria between initial to final time points, but Enterococcus concentrations from Enterolert panels remained stable for the duration of the study for both stream sediments. Antibiotic resistance indicated no distinct pattern of resistance or susceptibility to a suite of antibiotics. However, all isolates tested were resistant to bacitracin and nalidixic acid. In conclusion, we found that Enterolert was not exclusively selective for Enterococcus from freshwater environments and that sediment and polluted waterbodies have the potential to skew the presumed concentrations. More research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and selectivity of the medium used for the fluorogenic substrate test for Enterococcus enumeration.