Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real world outcomes of CFTR modulator therapy in Australian adults and children.
Kuek, Stephanie; McCullagh, Angela; Paul, Eldho; Armstrong, David.
Affiliation
  • Kuek S; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Monash Children's Hospital, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. Electronic address: stephanie.kuek@rch.org.au.
  • McCullagh A; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Monash Children's Hospital, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
  • Paul E; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
  • Armstrong D; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Monash Children's Hospital, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther ; 82: 102247, 2023 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37574040
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recent advances in CFTR modulator therapy have the potential to change the face of cystic fibrosis (CF). This retrospective observational study describes real world experience of the four available CFTR modulators in adults and children with CF in a single centre in Melbourne, Australia.

METHOD:

Data were collected for all patients treated with CFTR modulators at MonashCF between May 2012 and September 2020. Primary outcomes included lung function, admission days and BMI/BMI centile over time. Adverse events and reasons for changing or ceasing medications were also analysed.

RESULTS:

55% (74/133) adult and 46% (55/119) paediatric patients were treated with CFTR modulators. FEV1 increased in adults treated with ivacaftor (IVA) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) by 4.73% and 10.07% respectively, and BMI also improved in these groups. Nutrition improved in adults and children treated with lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA). There was no significant improvement in FEV1 or admission days with LUM/IVA or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA). 36% (31/85) ceased LUM/IVA, due to adverse effects in 81% (25/31). Of these, 92% (23/25) changed to TEZ/IVA, 78% (18/23) without significant adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings for LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA are less encouraging than those seen in clinical trials, with no significant improvement in lung function or admission days and a higher rate of adverse effects with LUM/IVA compared with phase 3 clinical trials. TEZ/IVA was generally well tolerated by those who experienced side effects with LUM/IVA. The small number of patients treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA had improvements in all parameters. These findings support ongoing use of IVA for individuals with gating mutations, and transition to ELX/TEZ/IVA once available for patients with at least one Phe508del mutation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator / Cystic Fibrosis Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Pulm Pharmacol Ther Journal subject: FARMACOLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator / Cystic Fibrosis Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Pulm Pharmacol Ther Journal subject: FARMACOLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article
...