Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Spine MRI Identifies Clinically Relevant Findings in Patients With Cancer Presenting With Back Pain.
Tringale, Kathryn R; Gangai, Natalie; Chua, Andrew; Godwin, Kendra; Guman, Gloria; Laufer, Ilya; Cathcart, Kathleen N S; Lis, Eric; Schmitt, Adam; Moskowitz, Chaya S; Chilov, Marina; Vachha, Behroze A.
Affiliation
  • Tringale KR; Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Gangai N; Department of Radiology.
  • Chua A; Department of Radiology.
  • Godwin K; Medical Library.
  • Guman G; Department of Radiology.
  • Laufer I; Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, NY.
  • Cathcart KNS; Urgent Care Service.
  • Lis E; Department of Radiology.
  • Schmitt A; Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Moskowitz CS; Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Chilov M; Medical Library.
  • Vachha BA; Department of Radiology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 49(6): 419-425, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37602415
STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to identify the diagnostic yield of spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting malignant pathology in cancer patients with back pain. We also sought to evaluate the role of MRI extent ( i.e. regional vs. total) in identifying malignant pathology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No prior study has systematically investigated the yield of spine MRI in a large cohort of cancer patients. METHODS: Spine MRI reports from 2017 to 2021 for back pain (acute and nonspecified chronicity) in cancer patients were reviewed to identify clinically relevant findings: malignant (1) epidural, (2) leptomeningeal, (3) intramedullary, (4) osseous disease, and (5) fracture. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between MRI extent and the presence of cancer-related findings. For patients with multiple MRIs, short-interval scans (≤4 mo) were evaluated to assess the yield of repeat imaging. RESULTS: At least one cancer-related finding was identified on 52% of 5989 spine MRIs ordered for back pain and 57% of 1130 spine MRIs ordered specifically for acute back pain. The most common pathology was malignant osseous disease (2545; 43%). Across all five categories, most findings (77%-89%) were new/progressive. Odds of identifying a finding were significantly higher with total versus regional spine MRIs ( P <0.001). Although only 14 patients had a positive regional MRI followed shortly by a positive total spine MRI, most of these repeat total spine MRIs (78%) identified findings outside the scope of the initial regional scan. Twenty-one patients had both computed tomography and MRI within 30 days of each other; eight (38%) had compression fractures appreciated on MRI but not on computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest imaging the total spine in cancer patients with back pain given higher odds of identifying malignant pathology and instances of capturing otherwise not visualized disease. Further work is warranted to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Back Pain / Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Back Pain / Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States