Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Voriconazole: Challenging Published Voriconazole Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models with Real-World Clinical Data.
Kluwe, Franziska; Michelet, Robin; Huisinga, Wilhelm; Zeitlinger, Markus; Mikus, Gerd; Kloft, Charlotte.
Affiliation
  • Kluwe F; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstraße 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany.
  • Michelet R; Graduate Research Training Program PharMetrX, Berlin/Potsdam, Germany.
  • Huisinga W; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstraße 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany.
  • Zeitlinger M; Institute of Mathematics, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Mikus G; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kloft C; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstraße 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 62(10): 1461-1477, 2023 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37603216
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) frequently uses nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) models to predict and optimize therapy outcomes based on patient characteristics and therapeutic drug monitoring data. MIPD is indicated for compounds with narrow therapeutic range and complex pharmacokinetics (PK), such as voriconazole, a broad-spectrum antifungal drug for prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections. To provide guidance and recommendations for evidence-based application of MIPD for voriconazole, this work aimed to (i) externally evaluate and compare the predictive performance of a published so-called 'hybrid' model for MIPD (an aggregate model comprising features and prior information from six previously published NLME models) versus two 'standard' NLME models of voriconazole, and (ii) investigate strategies and illustrate the clinical impact of Bayesian forecasting for voriconazole.

METHODS:

A workflow for external evaluation and application of MIPD for voriconazole was implemented. Published voriconazole NLME models were externally evaluated using a comprehensive in-house clinical database comprising nine voriconazole studies and prediction-/simulation-based diagnostics. The NLME models were applied using different Bayesian forecasting strategies to assess the influence of prior observations on model predictivity.

RESULTS:

The overall best predictive performance was obtained using the aggregate model. However, all NLME models showed only modest predictive performance, suggesting that (i) important PK processes were not sufficiently implemented in the structural submodels, (ii) sources of interindividual variability were not entirely captured, and (iii) interoccasion variability was not adequately accounted for. Predictive performance substantially improved by including the most recent voriconazole observations in MIPD.

CONCLUSION:

Our results highlight the potential clinical impact of MIPD for voriconazole and indicate the need for a comprehensive (pre-)clinical database as basis for model development and careful external model evaluation for compounds with complex PK before their successful use in MIPD.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Models, Biological / Antifungal Agents Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Models, Biological / Antifungal Agents Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany