Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Evaluation of Detectability in Clinical Practice of Metal Detectors, etc. for Magnetic Resonance Imaging].
Okawa, Ryuya; Hayashi, Norio; Kato, Yutaka; Deguchi, Yuki; Yahata, Seiji; Kobayashi, Shinsuke; Takahashi, Tetsuhiko.
Affiliation
  • Okawa R; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Institute of Brain and Blood Vessels, Mihara Memorial Hospital.
  • Hayashi N; Graduate School of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences.
  • Kato Y; Department of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences.
  • Deguchi Y; Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital.
  • Yahata S; Imaging Center, St. Marianna University Hospital.
  • Kobayashi S; Department of Radiological Technology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
  • Takahashi T; Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi ; 79(10): 1168-1179, 2023 Oct 20.
Article in Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37635066
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

In order to prevent magnetic materials from being brought into the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination room, many facilities have metal detectors, etc., but there are various types of equipment with different performance and characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate each detector in actual clinical practice.

METHODS:

At multiple facilities, gate-type magnetic detectors, pole-type magnetic detectors, handy-type magnetic detectors, and handy-type metal detectors were used to identify 9 types of objects that may be brought into the MRI examination room. We performed evaluation of detection distance measurement assuming actual operation.

RESULTS:

The gate type was only able to detect objects with strong magnetism. With the pole type, the closer the measurement distance was to the pole, the more objects could be detected, and the lower the pole, the shorter the detection distance. With the handy type, there were many objects that could be detected when the device and the object were brought into close contact.

CONCLUSION:

The detectability of the instruments varied depending on the size and type of the object. It is important to understand the characteristics of each device and use it according to the purpose in carrying-in confirmation before the examination.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: Ja Journal: Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: Ja Journal: Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi Year: 2023 Document type: Article