Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in a contemporary cohort of penile squamous cell carcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathologic and survival parameters: A study of 134 patients.
Lobo, Anandi; Mishra, Sourav K; Jha, Shilpy; Tiwari, Ankit; Kapoor, Rahul; Sharma, Shivani; Kaushal, Seema; Kiranmai, N Sri; Das, M Rakshitha; Peddinti, Kamal P; Sharma, Shailendra K; Bhardwaj, Nitin; Arora, Samriti; Jain, Deepika; Jain, Ekta; Munjal, Gauri; Shinde, Sayali; Malik, Vipra; Singh, Hena; Varshney, Juhi; Pradhan, Dinesh; Dixit, Mallika; Pattnaik, Niharika; Sharma, Ashish K; Barapatre, Yogesh R; Pradhan, Manas; Satapathy, Kaliprasad; Rath, Debadarshi; Jaiswal, Sunil; Das, Stithi; Khadenga, Chiraranjan; Routa, Sudhasmita; Baisakh, Manas R; Tiwari, Romila; Sampat, Nakul Y; Chakrabarti, Indranil; Parwani, Anil V; Mohanty, Sambit K.
Affiliation
  • Lobo A; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Urology, Kapoor Centre of Urology and Pathology, Raipur, India.
  • Mishra SK; Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Jha S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Tiwari A; Cold Spring Harbor Borniger Laboratory, New York, NY, US.
  • Kapoor R; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Urology, Kapoor Centre of Urology and Pathology, Raipur, India.
  • Sharma S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Kaushal S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Kiranmai NS; Pathnsitu Biotechnologies, Hyderabad, India.
  • Das MR; Pathnsitu Biotechnologies, Hyderabad, India.
  • Peddinti KP; Pathnsitu Biotechnologies, Hyderabad, India.
  • Sharma SK; Pathnsitu Biotechnologies, Hyderabad, India.
  • Bhardwaj N; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Arora S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Jain D; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Jain E; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Munjal G; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pathkind Laboratories, Gurgaon, India.
  • Shinde S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Malik V; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Singh H; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Varshney J; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Pradhan D; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sonic Healthcare, Jacksonville, FL, US.
  • Dixit M; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, India.
  • Pattnaik N; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Sharma AK; Department of Urology, Lotus Hospital and Advanced Urology Centre, Raipur, India.
  • Barapatre YR; Department of Urology, Lotus Hospital and Advanced Urology Centre, Raipur, India.
  • Pradhan M; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Satapathy K; Department of Urology, Apollo Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Rath D; Department of Urology, Uronephro Centre of Excellence, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Jaiswal S; Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Das S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Khadenga C; Department of Radiation Oncology, SUM Ultimate Medicare, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Routa S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Prolife Diagnostics, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Baisakh MR; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Prolife Diagnostics, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Tiwari R; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Sampat NY; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Chakrabarti I; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, India.
  • Parwani AV; Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, US.
  • Mohanty SK; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 161(1): 49-59, 2024 Jan 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37639681
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Penile squamous cell carcinomas (PCs) are rare malignancies with a dismal prognosis in a metastatic setting; therefore, novel immunotherapeutic modalities are an unmet need. One such modality is the immune checkpoint molecule programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). We sought to analyze PD-L1 expression and its correlation with various clinicopathologic parameters in a contemporary cohort of 134 patients with PC.

METHODS:

A cohort of 134 patients with PC was studied for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. The PD-L1 expression was evaluated using a combined proportion score with a cutoff of 1 or higher to define positivity. The results were correlated with various clinicopathologic parameters.

RESULTS:

Overall, 77 (57%) patients had positive PD-L1 expression. Significantly high PD-L1 expression was observed in high-grade tumors (P = .006). We found that 37% of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated subtypes and 73% of other histotype tumors expressed PD-L1, while 63% of HPV-associated tumors and 27% of other histotype tumors did not (odds ratio, 1.35; P = .002 when compared for HPV-associated groups vs all others). Similarly, PD-L1-positive tumors had a 3.61-times higher chance of being node positive than PD-L1-negative tumors (P = .0009). In addition, PD-L1 high-positive tumors had a 5-times higher chance of being p16ink4a negative than PD-L1 low-positive tumors (P = .004). The PD-L1-positive tumors had a lower overall survival and cancer-specific survival than PD-L1-negative tumors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, PD-L1 expression is associated with high-grade and metastatic tumors. Lower PD-L1 expression is observed more frequently in HPV-associated (warty or basaloid) subtypes than in other, predominantly HPV-independent types. As a result, PD-L1 positivity, including higher expression, portends lower overall and cancer-specific survival. These data provide a rational for further investigating PD-L1-based immunotherapeutics in PC.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Penile Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Papillomavirus Infections Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Penile Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Papillomavirus Infections Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India