Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stabilization and compensation strategy of the hip angle during gait in hip-osteoarthritis patients from the perspective of whole-body movement synergy.
Ibara, Takuya; Fujita, Koji; Watanabe, Naoto; Takada, Ryohei; Miyatake, Kazumasa; Nimura, Akimoto; Akita, Keiichi.
Affiliation
  • Ibara T; Department of Functional Joint Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan. Electronic address: ibara.fana@tmd.ac.jp.
  • Fujita K; Department of Functional Joint Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
  • Watanabe N; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
  • Takada R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
  • Miyatake K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
  • Nimura A; Department of Functional Joint Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
  • Akita K; Department of Clinical Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
Gait Posture ; 106: 65-71, 2023 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37660515
BACKGROUND: The implementation of a strategy to control the hip angle during gait is important to avoid disease progression in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). RESEARCH QUESTION: Do patients with hip OA tend to stabilize their hip angles by a combination of whole-body movements during gait in terms of variability? METHODS: A public gait dataset comprising 80 asymptomatic participants and 106 patients with hip OA was used. Uncontrolled manifold analysis was performed using the joint angles as elemental variables and the hip joint angles as performance variables. The synergy index ΔV, variances of elemental variables that did not affect the performance variable (VUCM) and of those that affected the performance variable (VORT), and index of covariation strategy (COV) were calculated in sagittal and frontal plane. A one-sample t-test for statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis was used for ΔV and COV. Two-sample t-tests of SPM analyses were used for ΔV, VUCM, and VORT to compare the two groups. RESULTS: In both planes, the ΔV and COV were significantly larger than zero in both groups (p < 0.001). In the sagittal plane, the VORT was higher in the hip OA group than in the control group after 77 % of stance phase. In the frontal plane, the hip OA group had larger ΔV and VUCM after last half and last quartile of stance phase compared to the control group, respectively. The VORT was smaller in the hip OA group than in the control group. SIGNIFICANCE: The hip angle was stabilized in the hip OA group in the frontal plane but insufficiently stabilized in the sagittal plane; however, the patients changed their hip angle during the early phase of stance. The combination of whole-body movements contributed to the stabilization of hip angle.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Osteoarthritis, Hip Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Gait Posture Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Osteoarthritis, Hip Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Gait Posture Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom