Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Polyethylene thickness does not influence aseptic revision rate with highly cross-linked liners in THA with 36-mm femoral heads.
Six, Willem R; Koenraadt-van Oost, Iris; van Boekel, Leonieke C; Bolder, Stefan B T.
Affiliation
  • Six WR; Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, North Brabant, The Netherlands.
  • Koenraadt-van Oost I; Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, North Brabant, The Netherlands.
  • van Boekel LC; Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, North Brabant, The Netherlands.
  • Bolder SBT; Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, North Brabant, The Netherlands.
Hip Int ; 34(2): 181-186, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37661691
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To reduce the risk of dislocation, larger head size can be used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, larger head size leads to thinner acetabular liners. With conventional polyethylene, thickness of >8 mm has been advocated to reduce stress and wear rate of the polyethylene. Modern polyethylene has become more wear-resistant. In this study, we investigated if the thickness of sequentially cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners is associated with failure of THA in the medium term. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

3654 THAs were included (2009-2016), in which THA was performed with a XLPE liner in combination with a 36-mm femoral head. Patient and surgical characteristics were collected. We compared implant survival of THA with thin liners (<7.9 mm) and thick liners (⩾7.9 mm) with a Kaplan Meier survival analysis at 5 years, median follow-up and 10 years of follow-up with and point aseptic loosening and performed a multivariate analysis to estimate hazard ratios (HR).

RESULTS:

Median follow-up was 7.7 years (IQR 5.6-9.8). In total, 179 revision procedures were performed, where 82 revisions (46%) were performed for aseptic loosening. The survival rate at 5 years, median and 10 years of follow-up showed no statistically significant difference in implant survival. The survival rate at 10 years follow-up was for thin liners 97.1% (95% CI, 96.3-97.9) and for thick liners 98.2% (95% CI, 97.4-99.0) in the aseptic loosening group (chi-square 2.55; p = 0.11).The adjusted HR for thick liners (⩾7.9 mm) was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.38-1.08) compared with the thin liners (<7.9 mm), which was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS:

From this single-centre retrospective study it appears that thinner polyethylene liners are well tolerated when using second-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene. Thickness of the XLPE liners did not influence the risk of aseptic loosening of the implants in the medium term.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Hip Int Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Hip Int Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands