Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The recalibration and redevelopment of a model to calculate patients' probability of completing a colonoscopy following an abnormal fecal test.
Petrik, Amanda F; Johnson, Eric S; Slaughter, Matthew; Leo, Michael C; Thompson, Jamie; Mummadi, Rajasekhara R; Jimenez, Ricardo; Hussain, Syed Akmal; Coronado, Gloria.
Affiliation
  • Petrik AF; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Johnson ES; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Slaughter M; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Leo MC; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Thompson J; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Mummadi RR; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Jimenez R; SeaMar Community Health Centers, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Hussain SA; SeaMar Community Health Centers, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Coronado G; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
J Med Screen ; 31(1): 28-34, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37661831
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an effective screening tool for colorectal cancer. If an FIT is abnormal, a follow-up colonoscopy is necessary to remove polyps or find cancers. We sought to develop a usable risk prediction model to identify patients unlikely to complete a colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT test.

METHODS:

We recalibrated and then redeveloped a prediction model in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), using a retrospective cohort of patients aged 50-75 with an abnormal FIT test and clinical data. Logistic and Cox regressions were used to recalibrate and then redevelop the model.

RESULTS:

The initial risk model used data from eight FQHCs (26 clinics) including 1723 patients. When we applied the model to a single large FQHC (34 clinics, 884 eligible patients), the model did not recalibrate successfully (c-statistic dropped more than 0.05, from 0.66 to 0.61). The model was redeveloped in the same FQHC in a cohort of 1401 patients with a c-statistic of 0.65.

CONCLUSIONS:

The original model developed in a group of FQHCs did not adequately recalibrate in the single large FQHC. Health system, patient characteristics or data differences may have led to the inability to recalibrate the model. However, the redeveloped model provides an adequate model for the single FQHC.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Med Screen Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Med Screen Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM