Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Motivational interviewing for preventing oral morbidities in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cartes-Velásquez, Ricardo; Varnet-Pérez, Tomás; Martínez-Delgado, Cecilia María; Villanueva-Vilchis, María Del Carmen; Ramírez-Trujillo, María de Los Ángeles; Faustino-Silva, Daniel Demétrio.
Affiliation
  • Cartes-Velásquez R; Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
  • Varnet-Pérez T; Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Martínez-Delgado CM; Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Villanueva-Vilchis MDC; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Leon, Mexico.
  • Ramírez-Trujillo MLÁ; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Leon, Mexico.
  • Faustino-Silva DD; Grupo Hospitalar Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 52(1): 84-92, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37668224
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to assess whether motivational interviewing (MI) effectively prevents oral morbidities in adults.

METHODS:

Studies considered were randomized controlled trials, cluster-randomized controlled trials and community-based randomized trials assessing interventions based on MI or indicating that a counselling technique based on the principles developed by Miller and Rollnick was used. Controls were any type of oral health education or negative controls. Participants were 18-60 years old. The main outcome was any oral morbidity. From 602 studies identified in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS databases, seven studies were included in the synthesis.

RESULTS:

Studies included only evaluated periodontal outcomes, no studies were found for other oral morbidities. Patients' mean age was 43.7 years, and the follow-up time after MI or MI-based intervention varied between 1 month and 1 year. The total study population was 272 people with moderate-to-severe periodontitis; other groups analysed were pregnant women (n = 112) and patients with mental disorders and alcohol problems (n = 60). Meta-analysis for the plaque index (four studies, n = 267), bleeding on probing (two studies, n = 177) and gingival index (two studies, n = 166) were carried out. The summary effects for the random-effects model were estimated respectively as -3.59 percentage points (CI [-11.44; 4.25] for plaque index, -6.41 percentage points (CI [-12.18, -0.65]) for bleeding on probing and -0.70 (CI [-1.87; 0.48]) for gingival index, marginally favouring the MI group. The reduced number of studies, the non-disclosure of some aspects of the data and the heterogeneity among them undermine the precision of the estimates.

CONCLUSION:

The current evidence available is limited to periodontal outcomes, and it is not possible to determine whether MI effectively prevents oral morbidities in adults.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Periodontitis / Motivational Interviewing Type of study: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Chile

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Periodontitis / Motivational Interviewing Type of study: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Chile