Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: An insight into confounding by indication.
Hajibandeh, Shahin; Ghassemi, Nader; Hajibandeh, Shahab; Romman, Saleh; Ghassemi, Ali; Laing, Richard W; Bhatt, Anand; Athwal, Tejinderjit S; Durkin, Damien.
Affiliation
  • Hajibandeh S; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom. Electronic address: shahin_hajibandeh@yahoo.com.
  • Ghassemi N; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
  • Hajibandeh S; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  • Romman S; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
  • Ghassemi A; Gemelli University Hospital, School of Medicine and Surgery, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
  • Laing RW; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
  • Bhatt A; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
  • Athwal TS; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
  • Durkin D; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Surgeon ; 22(1): e13-e25, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37673704
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To evaluate comparative outcomes of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (LDPS).

METHODS:

A systematic search of multiple electronic data sources and bibliographic reference lists were conducted. Comparative studies reporting outcomes of LSPDP and LDPS were considered followed by evaluation of the associated risk of bias according to ROBINS-I tool. Perioperative complications, clinically important postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), infectious complications, blood loss, conversion to open, operative time and duration of hospital stay were the investigated outcome parameters.

RESULTS:

Nineteen studies were identified enrolling 3739 patients of whom 1860 patients underwent LSPDP and the remaining 1879 patients had LDPS. The patients in the LSPDP and LDPS groups were of comparable age (p = 0.73), gender (p = 0.59), and BMI (p = 0.07). However, the patient in the LDPS group had larger tumour size (p = 0.0004) and more malignant lesions (p = 0.02). LSPDP was associated with significantly lower POPF (OR0.65, p = 0.02), blood loss (MD-28.30, p = 0.001), and conversion to open (OR0.48, p < 0.0001) compared to LDPS. Moreover, it was associated with significantly shorter procedure time (MD -22.06, p = 0.0009) and length of hospital stay (MD -0.75, p = 0.005). However, no significant differences were identified in overall perioperative (OR0.89, p = 0.25) or infectious (OR0.67, p = 0.05) complications between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

LSPDP seems to be associated with lower POPF, bleeding and conversion to open compared to LDPS in patients with small-sized benign tumours. Moreover, it may be quicker and reduce hospital stay. Nevertheless, such advantages are of doubtful merit about large-sized or malignant tumours. The available evidence is subject to confounding by indication.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Neoplasms / Laparoscopy Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surgeon Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatic Neoplasms / Laparoscopy Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surgeon Year: 2024 Document type: Article