Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Remotely Delivered Cancer Genetic Testing in the Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Swisher, Elizabeth M; Rayes, Nadine; Bowen, Deborah; Peterson, Christine B; Norquist, Barbara M; Coffin, Tara; Gavin, Kathleen; Polinsky, Deborah; Crase, Jamie; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N; Blank, Stephanie V; Munsell, Mark F; Nebgen, Denise; Fleming, Gini F; Olopade, Olufunmilayo I; Law, Sherman; Zhou, Alicia; Levine, Douglas A; D'Andrea, Alan; Lu, Karen H.
Affiliation
  • Swisher EM; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Rayes N; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  • Bowen D; Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Peterson CB; Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  • Norquist BM; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Coffin T; Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Gavin K; Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance, Minneapolis.
  • Polinsky D; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Crase J; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Bakkum-Gamez JN; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Blank SV; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Munsell MF; Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  • Nebgen D; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  • Fleming GF; Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Olopade OI; Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Law S; Color Health, Burlingame, California.
  • Zhou A; Color Health, Burlingame, California.
  • Levine DA; Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
  • D'Andrea A; Now with Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey.
  • Lu KH; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Oncol ; 9(11): 1547-1555, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37707822
ABSTRACT
Importance Requiring personalized genetic counseling may introduce barriers to cancer risk assessment, but it is unknown whether omitting counseling could increase distress.

Objective:

To assess whether omitting pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling would increase distress during remote testing. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) was a 4-arm, randomized noninferiority trial testing the effects of individualized pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling on participant distress 3 and 12 months posttest. Participants were recruited via social and traditional media, and enrollment occurred between April 27, 2017, and September 29, 2020. Participants were women aged 30 years or older, English-speaking, US residents, and had access to the internet and a health care professional. Previous cancer genetic testing or counseling was exclusionary. In the family history cohort, participants had a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In the familial pathogenic variant (PV) cohort, participants reported 1 biological relative with a PV in an actionable cancer susceptibility gene. Data analysis was performed between December 13, 2020, and May 31, 2023. Intervention Participants completed baseline questionnaires, watched an educational video, and were randomized to 1 of 4 arms the control arm with pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling, or 1 of 3 study arms without pretest and posttest counseling. Genetic counseling was provided by phone appointments and testing was done using home-delivered saliva kits. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

The primary outcome was participant distress measured by the Impact of Event Scale 3 months after receiving the results. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing, anxiety, depression, and decisional regret.

Results:

A total of 3839 women (median age, 44 years [range 22-91 years]), most of whom were non-Hispanic White and college educated, were randomized, 3125 in the family history and 714 in the familial PV cohorts. In the primary analysis in the family history cohort, all experimental arms were noninferior for distress at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences in anxiety, depression, or decisional regret at 3 months. The highest completion rates were seen in the 2 arms without pretest counseling. Conclusions and Relevance In the MAGENTA clinical trial, omitting individualized pretest counseling for all participants and posttest counseling for those without PV during remote genetic testing was not inferior with regard to posttest distress, providing an alternative care model for genetic risk assessment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02993068.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Rosaniline Dyes Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: JAMA Oncol Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Rosaniline Dyes Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: JAMA Oncol Year: 2023 Document type: Article