Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Metacognition in Community-Dwelling Older Black and African American Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Kero, Katherine; Halter, Colt M; Moll, Allison C; Hanna, Sophie M; Woodard, John L; Giordani, Bruno; Daugherty, Ana M; Kavcic, Voyko.
Affiliation
  • Kero K; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Halter CM; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Moll AC; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Hanna SM; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Woodard JL; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Giordani B; Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Daugherty AM; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Kavcic V; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 96(1): 301-311, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742635
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cognitive assessment of older adults typically includes symptom reports and objective evaluations. However, there is often poor agreement between these measures. Cultural norms, stress, and anxiety may also influence cognitive self-appraisal and performance. Little research describes how other factors affect the self-report/objective test discrepancies noted in the literature.

OBJECTIVE:

This study investigated whether the disparity between subjective cognitive concerns and objective cognitive performance is related to measures of anxiety and stress in older Black and African American adults.

METHODS:

Telephone screenings were administered to 206 older adults (ages 64-94) during the first year of the pandemic. Demographic data, objective memory (Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status [TICS-m]), an adaptation of the subjective memory measure, the Cognitive Change Questionnaire, emphasizing executive functioning in everyday life [CCQ-e]), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS4) were measured. Metacognition Discrepancy Index (MDI) was calculated from the standardized residual after regressing TICS-m on CCQ-e scores to quantify the discrepancy between cognitive self-appraisal and objective cognitive functioning.

RESULTS:

Neither GAD-7 nor PSS-4 moderated the relationship between TICS-m and CCQ-e, and TICS-m scores weakly predicted subjective CCQ-e scores (F(1, 197)=4.37, p = 0.038, R2 = 0.022). The MDI correlated with stress and anxiety (rs = 0.294, 0.396, ps < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Discrepancies exist between objectively measured and self-evaluated cognition. Elevations in stress and anxiety are associated with greater overestimation of cognitive difficulties relative to objective performance. Pandemic-related stressors may have worsened anxiety and diminished self-appraisal of cognitive abilities for some individuals, while others may remain reluctant to acknowledge impairments. Social and emotional factors are meaningful considerations in assessing cognitive difficulties.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metacognition / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Journal subject: GERIATRIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metacognition / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans Language: En Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Journal subject: GERIATRIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States