Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A psychosocial network approach studying biomedical HIV prevention uptake between 2017 and 2019.
Zimmermann, Hanne M L; Davidovich, Udi; van Bilsen, Ward P H; Coyer, Liza; Matser, Amy; Prins, Maria; van Harreveld, Frenk.
Affiliation
  • Zimmermann HML; Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.zimmermann@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • Davidovich U; Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. h.zimmermann@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • van Bilsen WPH; Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Coyer L; Department of Social Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Matser A; Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity Institute (AII), Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Prins M; Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Harreveld F; Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 16168, 2023 09 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37758796
ABSTRACT
Biomedical HIV-prevention strategies (BmPS) among men who have sex with men (MSM), such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and viral load sorting (VLS), are essential but relatively new and their uptake gradual. Using an extension of the causal attitude network approach, we investigated which beliefs are related to uptake of PrEP and VLS at each time-point. We included 632 HIV-negative MSM from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies from four data-waves between 2017 and 2019. We estimated weighted, undirected networks for each time-point, where we included pairwise interactions of PrEP and VLS uptake and related beliefs. PrEP use increased from 10 to 31% (p < 0.001), while VLS was reported by 7-10% at each time-point. Uptake of both BmPS was directly related to the perceived positive impact of the strategy on one's quality of sex life and perceived supportive social norms. Overall network structure differed between time points, specifically in regard to PrEP. At earlier time points, perceptions of efficacy and affordability played an important role for PrEP uptake, while more recently social and health-related concerns became increasingly important.The network structure differed across data-waves, suggesting specific time changes in uptake motives. These findings may be used in communication to increase prevention uptake.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Homosexuality, Male / Sexual and Gender Minorities Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Homosexuality, Male / Sexual and Gender Minorities Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands