Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
On the reproducibility of extrusion-based bioprinting: round robin study on standardization in the field.
Grijalva Garces, David; Strauß, Svenja; Gretzinger, Sarah; Schmieg, Barbara; Jüngst, Tomasz; Groll, Jürgen; Meinel, Lorenz; Schmidt, Isabelle; Hartmann, Hanna; Schenke-Layland, Katja; Brandt, Nico; Selzer, Michael; Zimmermann, Stefan; Koltay, Peter; Southan, Alexander; Tovar, Günter E M; Schmidt, Sarah; Weber, Achim; Ahlfeld, Tilman; Gelinsky, Michael; Scheibel, Thomas; Detsch, Rainer; Boccaccini, Aldo R; Naolou, Toufik; Lee-Thedieck, Cornelia; Willems, Christian; Groth, Thomas; Allgeier, Stephan; Köhler, Bernd; Friedrich, Tiaan; Briesen, Heiko; Buchholz, Janine; Paulus, Dietrich; von Gladiss, Anselm; Hubbuch, Jürgen.
Affiliation
  • Grijalva Garces D; Institute of Functional Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
  • Strauß S; Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Section IV: Biomolecular Separation Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Gretzinger S; Institute of Functional Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
  • Schmieg B; Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Section IV: Biomolecular Separation Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Jüngst T; Institute of Functional Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
  • Groll J; Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Section IV: Biomolecular Separation Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Meinel L; Institute of Functional Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
  • Schmidt I; Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Section IV: Biomolecular Separation Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Hartmann H; Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Functional Materials and Biofabrication, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Schenke-Layland K; Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
  • Brandt N; Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Functional Materials and Biofabrication, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Selzer M; Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
  • Zimmermann S; Institute of Pharmacy and Food Chemistry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Koltay P; NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
  • Southan A; NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
  • Tovar GEM; NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
  • Schmidt S; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department for Medical Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Weber A; Institute for Applied Materials, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Ahlfeld T; Institute for Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Gelinsky M; Laboratory for MEMS Applications, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Scheibel T; Laboratory for MEMS Applications, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Detsch R; Institute of Interfacial Process Engineering and Plasma Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Boccaccini AR; Functional Surfaces and Materials, Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Naolou T; Institute of Interfacial Process Engineering and Plasma Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Lee-Thedieck C; Functional Surfaces and Materials, Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Willems C; Functional Surfaces and Materials, Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Groth T; Functional Surfaces and Materials, Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Allgeier S; Center for Translational Bone, Joint, and Soft Tissue Research, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Köhler B; Center for Translational Bone, Joint, and Soft Tissue Research, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Friedrich T; Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
  • Briesen H; Chair of Biomaterials, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
  • Buchholz J; Institute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Paulus D; Institute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • von Gladiss A; Institute of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Hubbuch J; Institute of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Biofabrication ; 16(1)2023 10 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37769669
ABSTRACT
The outcome of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting heavily depends, amongst others, on the interaction between the developed bioink, the printing process, and the printing equipment. However, if this interplay is ensured, bioprinting promises unmatched possibilities in the health care area. To pave the way for comparing newly developed biomaterials, clinical studies, and medical applications (i.e. printed organs, patient-specific tissues), there is a great need for standardization of manufacturing methods in order to enable technology transfers. Despite the importance of such standardization, there is currently a tremendous lack of empirical data that examines the reproducibility and robustness of production in more than one location at a time. In this work, we present data derived from a round robin test for extrusion-based 3D printing performance comprising 12 different academic laboratories throughout Germany and analyze the respective prints using automated image analysis (IA) in three independent academic groups. The fabrication of objects from polymer solutions was standardized as much as currently possible to allow studying the comparability of results from different laboratories. This study has led to the conclusion that current standardization conditions still leave room for the intervention of operators due to missing automation of the equipment. This affects significantly the reproducibility and comparability of bioprinting experiments in multiple laboratories. Nevertheless, automated IA proved to be a suitable methodology for quality assurance as three independently developed workflows achieved similar results. Moreover, the extracted data describing geometric features showed how the function of printers affects the quality of the printed object. A significant step toward standardization of the process was made as an infrastructure for distribution of material and methods, as well as for data transfer and storage was successfully established.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bioprinting Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Biofabrication Journal subject: BIOTECNOLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bioprinting Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Biofabrication Journal subject: BIOTECNOLOGIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany