Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer through urine metabolomic signatures: A large-scale validated study.
Huang, Hsiang-Po; Chen, Chung-Hsin; Chang, Kai-Hsiung; Lee, Ming-Shyue; Lee, Cheng-Fan; Chao, Yen-Hsiang; Lu, Shih-Yu; Wu, Tzu-Fan; Liang, Sung-Tzu; Lin, Chih-Yu; Lin, Yuan Chi; Liu, Shih-Ping; Lu, Yu-Chuan; Shun, Chia-Tung; Huang, William J; Lin, Tzu-Ping; Ku, Ming-Hsuan; Chung, Hsiao-Jen; Chang, Yen-Hwa; Liao, Chun-Hou; Yu, Chih-Chin; Chung, Shiu-Dong; Tsai, Yao-Chou; Wu, Chia-Chang; Chen, Kuan-Chou; Ho, Chen-Hsun; Hsiao, Pei-Wen; Pu, Yeong-Shiau.
Affiliation
  • Huang HP; Graduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen CH; Department of Urology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Chang KH; Institute of Cellular and System Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
  • Lee MS; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lee CF; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chao YH; Department of Urology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Lu SY; Department of Urology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Wu TF; Department of Urology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Liang ST; Department of Urology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Lin CY; Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Road, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
  • Lin YC; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Liu SP; Department of Urology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Lu YC; Department of Urology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, 7 Zhongshan South Road, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Shun CT; Department of Surgical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Huang WJ; Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lin TP; Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Ku MH; Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chung HJ; Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chang YH; Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Liao CH; Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Yu CC; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Chung SD; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Tsai YC; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, and the Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, College of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
  • Wu CC; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, and Department of Nursing, College of Healthcare & Management, Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Chen KC; Department of Medicine & Division of Urology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Ho CH; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Hsiao PW; Department of Urology, Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Pu YS; TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Transl Med ; 21(1): 714, 2023 10 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37821919
PURPOSE: Currently, there are no accurate markers for predicting potentially lethal prostate cancer (PC) before biopsy. This study aimed to develop urine tests to predict clinically significant PC (sPC) in men at risk. METHODS: Urine samples from 928 men, namely, 660 PC patients and 268 benign subjects, were analyzed by gas chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrophotometry (GC/Q-TOF MS) metabolomic profiling to construct four predictive models. Model I discriminated between PC and benign cases. Models II, III, and GS, respectively, predicted sPC in those classified as having favorable intermediate risk or higher, unfavorable intermediate risk or higher (according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groupings), and a Gleason sum (GS) of ≥ 7. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). RESULTS: In Models I, II, III, and GS, the best AUCs (0.94, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively; training cohort, N = 603) involved 26, 24, 26, and 22 metabolites, respectively. The addition of five clinical risk factors (serum prostate-specific antigen, patient age, previous negative biopsy, digital rectal examination, and family history) significantly improved the AUCs of the models (0.95, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.87, respectively). At 90% sensitivity, 48%, 47%, 50%, and 36% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided. These models were successfully validated against an independent validation cohort (N = 325). Decision curve analysis showed a significant clinical net benefit with each combined model at low threshold probabilities. Models II and III were more robust and clinically relevant than Model GS. CONCLUSION: This urine test, which combines urine metabolic markers and clinical factors, may be used to predict sPC and thereby inform the necessity of biopsy in men with an elevated PC risk.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Metabolome Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Transl Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Metabolome Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Transl Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan Country of publication: United kingdom