Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiology reporting of incidental osteoporotic vertebral fragility fractures present on CT studies: results of UK national re-audit.
Howlett, D C; Drinkwater, K J; Mahmood, N; Salman, L; Griffin, J; Javaid, M K; Retnasingam, G; Marzoug, A; Greenhalgh, R.
Affiliation
  • Howlett DC; Department of Radiology, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, UK.
  • Drinkwater KJ; Directorate of Education and Professional Practice, Royal College of Radiologists, London, UK. Electronic address: karl_drinkwater@rcr.ac.uk.
  • Mahmood N; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
  • Salman L; Department of Radiology, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, UK.
  • Griffin J; The Royal Osteoporosis Society, Bath, UK.
  • Javaid MK; The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.
  • Retnasingam G; Department of Radiology St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, UK.
  • Marzoug A; Department of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
  • Greenhalgh R; Department of Radiology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK.
Clin Radiol ; 78(12): e1041-e1047, 2023 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37838545
AIM: To describe a UK-wide re-audit of the 2019 Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) audit evaluating patient-related data and organisational infrastructure in the radiological reporting of vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) on computed tomography (CT) studies and to assess the impact of a series of RCR interventions, initiated to raise VFF awareness, on reporting practice and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient specific and organisational questionnaires largely replicated those utilised in 2019. The patient questionnaire involved retrospective analysis of between 50 and 100 consecutive, non-traumatic CT studies which included the thoracolumbar spine. All RCR radiology audit leads were invited to participate. Data collection commenced from 1 April 2022. RESULTS: Data were supplied by 129/194 (67%) departments. One thousand five hundred and eighty-six of 7,316 patients (21.7%) had a VFF on auditor review. Overall improvements were demonstrated in key initial/provisional reporting results; comment on spine/bone (93.2%, 14.4% improvement, p<0.0002); fracture severity assessment (34.7%, 8.5% improvement, p=0.0007); use of recommended terminology (67.8%, 7.5% improvement, p=0.0034); recommendations for further management (11.7%, 9.1% improvement, p<0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The 2022 national re-audit confirms improvements in diagnostic performance and practice in VFF reporting. Continuing work is required to build on this improvement and to further embed best practice.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Spinal Fractures / Osteoporotic Fractures Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Radiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Spinal Fractures / Osteoporotic Fractures Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Radiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom